Un destino paradigmatico. L'ibrido e la necessità del γάμος nel mito di Io

Risultato della ricerca: Chapter

Abstract

The main stages in the myth of the Argive Io are seduction by Zeus, being guarded by “all-seeing” Argos, her bovine hybridization and mad wanderings from Argos to Egypt, and finally her return to the human form and the birth of Epaphus, Zeus’ son. The agent of Io’s hybridization is either Zeus or Hera. Another aspect of this myth is the rejection of one’s love – also of marriage – for the purpose of preserving a condition of virginity and of “freedom” that is anomalous for women. If it is the case that Hera is the cause of Io’s evils, the girl herself appears as the paradigm of the unavoidable “yoke” of love and marriage for women, especially in Aeschylus’ Suppliant Women. Io shares the same bovine imagery as Hera (who is βοῶπις, “ox-eyed”), and her myth has substantial similarities with the myth of the Proitids. Both myths highlight the notion of the necessity of marriage (γάμος): Io rids herself of suffering, as a heifer harassed by a gadfly, by means of conceiving a child and bearing it. In the light of the bovine imagery, and in consideration of Io’s representation not just as a heifer-girl, but even as a bull-girl – a hypostasis of Dionysus, associated with sex and fertility – this paper aims at considering Io's hybridity in relation to female sexuality and the social position of women in marriage.
Lingua originaleItalian
Titolo della pubblicazione ospiteΣυναγωνίζεσθαι. Studies in Honour of Guido Avezzù
Pagine167-193
Numero di pagine27
VolumeI-1
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2018

Serie di pubblicazioni

NomeSKENÈ, TEXTS AND STUDIES

Cita questo

Provenza, A. (2018). Un destino paradigmatico. L'ibrido e la necessità del γάμος nel mito di Io. In Συναγωνίζεσθαι. Studies in Honour of Guido Avezzù (Vol. I-1, pagg. 167-193). (SKENÈ, TEXTS AND STUDIES).

Un destino paradigmatico. L'ibrido e la necessità del γάμος nel mito di Io. / Provenza, Antonietta.

Συναγωνίζεσθαι. Studies in Honour of Guido Avezzù. Vol. I-1 2018. pag. 167-193 (SKENÈ, TEXTS AND STUDIES).

Risultato della ricerca: Chapter

Provenza, A 2018, Un destino paradigmatico. L'ibrido e la necessità del γάμος nel mito di Io. in Συναγωνίζεσθαι. Studies in Honour of Guido Avezzù. vol. I-1, SKENÈ, TEXTS AND STUDIES, pagg. 167-193.
Provenza A. Un destino paradigmatico. L'ibrido e la necessità del γάμος nel mito di Io. In Συναγωνίζεσθαι. Studies in Honour of Guido Avezzù. Vol. I-1. 2018. pag. 167-193. (SKENÈ, TEXTS AND STUDIES).
Provenza, Antonietta. / Un destino paradigmatico. L'ibrido e la necessità del γάμος nel mito di Io. Συναγωνίζεσθαι. Studies in Honour of Guido Avezzù. Vol. I-1 2018. pagg. 167-193 (SKENÈ, TEXTS AND STUDIES).
@inbook{3239ec81479b47d2ac62cd7c88a5e148,
title = "Un destino paradigmatico. L'ibrido e la necessit{\`a} del γάμος nel mito di Io",
abstract = "The main stages in the myth of the Argive Io are seduction by Zeus, being guarded by “all-seeing” Argos, her bovine hybridization and mad wanderings from Argos to Egypt, and finally her return to the human form and the birth of Epaphus, Zeus’ son. The agent of Io’s hybridization is either Zeus or Hera. Another aspect of this myth is the rejection of one’s love – also of marriage – for the purpose of preserving a condition of virginity and of “freedom” that is anomalous for women. If it is the case that Hera is the cause of Io’s evils, the girl herself appears as the paradigm of the unavoidable “yoke” of love and marriage for women, especially in Aeschylus’ Suppliant Women. Io shares the same bovine imagery as Hera (who is βοῶπις, “ox-eyed”), and her myth has substantial similarities with the myth of the Proitids. Both myths highlight the notion of the necessity of marriage (γάμος): Io rids herself of suffering, as a heifer harassed by a gadfly, by means of conceiving a child and bearing it. In the light of the bovine imagery, and in consideration of Io’s representation not just as a heifer-girl, but even as a bull-girl – a hypostasis of Dionysus, associated with sex and fertility – this paper aims at considering Io's hybridity in relation to female sexuality and the social position of women in marriage.",
author = "Antonietta Provenza",
year = "2018",
language = "Italian",
isbn = "9788864645032",
volume = "I-1",
series = "SKEN{\`E}, TEXTS AND STUDIES",
pages = "167--193",
booktitle = "Συναγωνίζεσθαι. Studies in Honour of Guido Avezz{\`u}",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Un destino paradigmatico. L'ibrido e la necessità del γάμος nel mito di Io

AU - Provenza, Antonietta

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The main stages in the myth of the Argive Io are seduction by Zeus, being guarded by “all-seeing” Argos, her bovine hybridization and mad wanderings from Argos to Egypt, and finally her return to the human form and the birth of Epaphus, Zeus’ son. The agent of Io’s hybridization is either Zeus or Hera. Another aspect of this myth is the rejection of one’s love – also of marriage – for the purpose of preserving a condition of virginity and of “freedom” that is anomalous for women. If it is the case that Hera is the cause of Io’s evils, the girl herself appears as the paradigm of the unavoidable “yoke” of love and marriage for women, especially in Aeschylus’ Suppliant Women. Io shares the same bovine imagery as Hera (who is βοῶπις, “ox-eyed”), and her myth has substantial similarities with the myth of the Proitids. Both myths highlight the notion of the necessity of marriage (γάμος): Io rids herself of suffering, as a heifer harassed by a gadfly, by means of conceiving a child and bearing it. In the light of the bovine imagery, and in consideration of Io’s representation not just as a heifer-girl, but even as a bull-girl – a hypostasis of Dionysus, associated with sex and fertility – this paper aims at considering Io's hybridity in relation to female sexuality and the social position of women in marriage.

AB - The main stages in the myth of the Argive Io are seduction by Zeus, being guarded by “all-seeing” Argos, her bovine hybridization and mad wanderings from Argos to Egypt, and finally her return to the human form and the birth of Epaphus, Zeus’ son. The agent of Io’s hybridization is either Zeus or Hera. Another aspect of this myth is the rejection of one’s love – also of marriage – for the purpose of preserving a condition of virginity and of “freedom” that is anomalous for women. If it is the case that Hera is the cause of Io’s evils, the girl herself appears as the paradigm of the unavoidable “yoke” of love and marriage for women, especially in Aeschylus’ Suppliant Women. Io shares the same bovine imagery as Hera (who is βοῶπις, “ox-eyed”), and her myth has substantial similarities with the myth of the Proitids. Both myths highlight the notion of the necessity of marriage (γάμος): Io rids herself of suffering, as a heifer harassed by a gadfly, by means of conceiving a child and bearing it. In the light of the bovine imagery, and in consideration of Io’s representation not just as a heifer-girl, but even as a bull-girl – a hypostasis of Dionysus, associated with sex and fertility – this paper aims at considering Io's hybridity in relation to female sexuality and the social position of women in marriage.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/351223

UR - http://www.skenejournal.it/texts-studies/index.php/TS/catalog/book/51

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9788864645032

VL - I-1

T3 - SKENÈ, TEXTS AND STUDIES

SP - 167

EP - 193

BT - Συναγωνίζεσθαι. Studies in Honour of Guido Avezzù

ER -