Two minds that never met: Frank H. Knight on John M. Keynes once again – a documentary note

Luca Fiorito, Carlo Cristiano

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

This note presents new archival evidence about Frank H. Knight’s views on John M. Keynes.The relevant material is composed of a series of lecture notes taken by Perham C. Nahl inFrank H. Knight’s course on Business Cycles at the University of California at Berkeley inthe fall of 1936. It emerges from the notes that the methodological gap between Keynes andKnight was irreducible, which explains the harsh tone of Knight’s published review ofThe General Theory. Connected to this is Knight’s strenuous defense of the ‘postulatesof classical political economy’ as criticized by Keynes in chapter 2 of his book, an argumentthat was better expounded in the classroom than in the review. However, besidesstrong criticisms, a few constructive remarks can also be found in the notes. In criticizingKeynes, Knight proposed an interesting analysis of the business cycle that he did notdevelop in the published review of The General Theory, and there is even some evidencethat Knight was attracted to Keynes’s discussion of ‘liquidity preference.’
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)67-98
Numero di pagine32
RivistaDefault journal
Volume4
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

John Maynard Keynes
Business cycles
General theory
Classical political economy
Criticism
Liquidity preference

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cita questo

Two minds that never met: Frank H. Knight on John M. Keynes once again – a documentary note. / Fiorito, Luca; Cristiano, Carlo.

In: Default journal, Vol. 4, 2016, pag. 67-98.

Risultato della ricerca: Article

@article{9d5cd6cfd4884dc79389add83bd9fb8d,
title = "Two minds that never met: Frank H. Knight on John M. Keynes once again – a documentary note",
abstract = "This note presents new archival evidence about Frank H. Knight’s views on John M. Keynes.The relevant material is composed of a series of lecture notes taken by Perham C. Nahl inFrank H. Knight’s course on Business Cycles at the University of California at Berkeley inthe fall of 1936. It emerges from the notes that the methodological gap between Keynes andKnight was irreducible, which explains the harsh tone of Knight’s published review ofThe General Theory. Connected to this is Knight’s strenuous defense of the ‘postulatesof classical political economy’ as criticized by Keynes in chapter 2 of his book, an argumentthat was better expounded in the classroom than in the review. However, besidesstrong criticisms, a few constructive remarks can also be found in the notes. In criticizingKeynes, Knight proposed an interesting analysis of the business cycle that he did notdevelop in the published review of The General Theory, and there is even some evidencethat Knight was attracted to Keynes’s discussion of ‘liquidity preference.’",
author = "Luca Fiorito and Carlo Cristiano",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "67--98",
journal = "Default journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two minds that never met: Frank H. Knight on John M. Keynes once again – a documentary note

AU - Fiorito, Luca

AU - Cristiano, Carlo

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This note presents new archival evidence about Frank H. Knight’s views on John M. Keynes.The relevant material is composed of a series of lecture notes taken by Perham C. Nahl inFrank H. Knight’s course on Business Cycles at the University of California at Berkeley inthe fall of 1936. It emerges from the notes that the methodological gap between Keynes andKnight was irreducible, which explains the harsh tone of Knight’s published review ofThe General Theory. Connected to this is Knight’s strenuous defense of the ‘postulatesof classical political economy’ as criticized by Keynes in chapter 2 of his book, an argumentthat was better expounded in the classroom than in the review. However, besidesstrong criticisms, a few constructive remarks can also be found in the notes. In criticizingKeynes, Knight proposed an interesting analysis of the business cycle that he did notdevelop in the published review of The General Theory, and there is even some evidencethat Knight was attracted to Keynes’s discussion of ‘liquidity preference.’

AB - This note presents new archival evidence about Frank H. Knight’s views on John M. Keynes.The relevant material is composed of a series of lecture notes taken by Perham C. Nahl inFrank H. Knight’s course on Business Cycles at the University of California at Berkeley inthe fall of 1936. It emerges from the notes that the methodological gap between Keynes andKnight was irreducible, which explains the harsh tone of Knight’s published review ofThe General Theory. Connected to this is Knight’s strenuous defense of the ‘postulatesof classical political economy’ as criticized by Keynes in chapter 2 of his book, an argumentthat was better expounded in the classroom than in the review. However, besidesstrong criticisms, a few constructive remarks can also be found in the notes. In criticizingKeynes, Knight proposed an interesting analysis of the business cycle that he did notdevelop in the published review of The General Theory, and there is even some evidencethat Knight was attracted to Keynes’s discussion of ‘liquidity preference.’

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/180935

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 67

EP - 98

JO - Default journal

JF - Default journal

ER -