Two minds that never met: Frank H. Knight on John M. Keynes once again – a documentary note

Luca Fiorito, Carlo Cristiano

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

This note presents new archival evidence about Frank H. Knight’s views on John M. Keynes. The relevant material is composed of a series of lecture notes taken by Perham C. Nahl in Frank H. Knight’s course on Business Cycles at the University of California at Berkeley in the fall of 1936. It emerges from the notes that the methodological gap between Keynes and Knight was irreducible, which explains the harsh tone of Knight’s published review of The General Theory. Connected to this is Knight’s strenuous defense of the ‘postulates of classical political economy’ as criticized by Keynes in chapter 2 of his book, an argument that was better expounded in the classroom than in the review. However, besides strong criticisms, a few constructive remarks can also be found in the notes. In criticizing Keynes, Knight proposed an interesting analysis of the business cycle that he did not develop in the published review of The General Theory, and there is even some evidence that Knight was attracted to Keynes’s discussion of ‘liquidity preference.’
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)67-98
Numero di pagine32
RivistaReview of Keynesian Economics
Volume4
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

John Maynard Keynes
Business cycles
General theory
Classical political economy
Criticism
Liquidity preference

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cita questo

@article{9d5cd6cfd4884dc79389add83bd9fb8d,
title = "Two minds that never met: Frank H. Knight on John M. Keynes once again – a documentary note",
abstract = "This note presents new archival evidence about Frank H. Knight’s views on John M. Keynes. The relevant material is composed of a series of lecture notes taken by Perham C. Nahl in Frank H. Knight’s course on Business Cycles at the University of California at Berkeley in the fall of 1936. It emerges from the notes that the methodological gap between Keynes and Knight was irreducible, which explains the harsh tone of Knight’s published review of The General Theory. Connected to this is Knight’s strenuous defense of the ‘postulates of classical political economy’ as criticized by Keynes in chapter 2 of his book, an argument that was better expounded in the classroom than in the review. However, besides strong criticisms, a few constructive remarks can also be found in the notes. In criticizing Keynes, Knight proposed an interesting analysis of the business cycle that he did not develop in the published review of The General Theory, and there is even some evidence that Knight was attracted to Keynes’s discussion of ‘liquidity preference.’",
author = "Luca Fiorito and Carlo Cristiano",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "67--98",
journal = "Review of Keynesian Economics",
issn = "2049-5323",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two minds that never met: Frank H. Knight on John M. Keynes once again – a documentary note

AU - Fiorito, Luca

AU - Cristiano, Carlo

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This note presents new archival evidence about Frank H. Knight’s views on John M. Keynes. The relevant material is composed of a series of lecture notes taken by Perham C. Nahl in Frank H. Knight’s course on Business Cycles at the University of California at Berkeley in the fall of 1936. It emerges from the notes that the methodological gap between Keynes and Knight was irreducible, which explains the harsh tone of Knight’s published review of The General Theory. Connected to this is Knight’s strenuous defense of the ‘postulates of classical political economy’ as criticized by Keynes in chapter 2 of his book, an argument that was better expounded in the classroom than in the review. However, besides strong criticisms, a few constructive remarks can also be found in the notes. In criticizing Keynes, Knight proposed an interesting analysis of the business cycle that he did not develop in the published review of The General Theory, and there is even some evidence that Knight was attracted to Keynes’s discussion of ‘liquidity preference.’

AB - This note presents new archival evidence about Frank H. Knight’s views on John M. Keynes. The relevant material is composed of a series of lecture notes taken by Perham C. Nahl in Frank H. Knight’s course on Business Cycles at the University of California at Berkeley in the fall of 1936. It emerges from the notes that the methodological gap between Keynes and Knight was irreducible, which explains the harsh tone of Knight’s published review of The General Theory. Connected to this is Knight’s strenuous defense of the ‘postulates of classical political economy’ as criticized by Keynes in chapter 2 of his book, an argument that was better expounded in the classroom than in the review. However, besides strong criticisms, a few constructive remarks can also be found in the notes. In criticizing Keynes, Knight proposed an interesting analysis of the business cycle that he did not develop in the published review of The General Theory, and there is even some evidence that Knight was attracted to Keynes’s discussion of ‘liquidity preference.’

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/180935

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 67

EP - 98

JO - Review of Keynesian Economics

JF - Review of Keynesian Economics

SN - 2049-5323

ER -