"The Splinter in Your Eye is the Best Magnifying Glass”. Detouring Media Literacy through Adorno’s Critical Theory

Risultato della ricerca: Chapter

Abstract

I have never fully bought (albeit often tempted to) into the simplistic and somewhat caricaturist versions of Theodor Adorno’s ideas about the cultural industry and the alienated consumer given by some supporters of the “active” audience. Even more so today, when digital social media seem to make participatory culture, creativity and active citizenship a dream coming true. I have always thought instead that, beyond the traps of binary thinking (powerful media vs active audience), there is a much more complex story to be told and that we, as cultural analysts and media literacy educators, need to patiently reconstruct – with all possible evidence coming from empirical data – the intricacy of the intersections and contradictions between the constraining discipline of structures at macro level and the empowering anti-discipline of individuals at micro level, between power as strategy and power as tactic, between society at large and the sitting room where I watch my favorite TV show, between culture as meaning and culture as action. Drawing from my personal encounters with Adorno’s writings, particularly those devoted to socio-musical enquiry, in this chapter I want to argue that these writings offer impressive keys to a perspective where much broader questions about the media in/as everyday life can be addressed: how media are defined as (and in relation to) social process, how media materials (including the ways they are interpreted and evaluated) are created, revised, and undercut with reference to specific social relations and social contexts of action, how media provide constraining and enabling resources for social agents, i. e., modes of conduct, evaluative judgments, social scenarios and institutional arrangements, emotional conditions and so forth. Ultimately, I want to argue that, by taking a detour through Adorno, media literacy education can better respond to the urgent need to (re)theorize and (re)politicize its discourses and practices as “negative dialectics”, as Adorno would put it.
Lingua originaleEnglish
Titolo della pubblicazione ospiteExploring the Roots of Digital and Media Literacy through Personal Narrative
Pagine107-125
Numero di pagine19
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

critical theory
literacy
negative dialectic
social judgement
macro level
micro level
social process
social media
tactics
Social Relations
everyday life
creativity
citizenship
educator
scenario
industry
discourse
resources
evidence
education

Cita questo

Cappello, G. M. (2016). "The Splinter in Your Eye is the Best Magnifying Glass”. Detouring Media Literacy through Adorno’s Critical Theory. In Exploring the Roots of Digital and Media Literacy through Personal Narrative (pagg. 107-125)

"The Splinter in Your Eye is the Best Magnifying Glass”. Detouring Media Literacy through Adorno’s Critical Theory. / Cappello, Gianna Maria.

Exploring the Roots of Digital and Media Literacy through Personal Narrative. 2016. pag. 107-125.

Risultato della ricerca: Chapter

Cappello, GM 2016, "The Splinter in Your Eye is the Best Magnifying Glass”. Detouring Media Literacy through Adorno’s Critical Theory. in Exploring the Roots of Digital and Media Literacy through Personal Narrative. pagg. 107-125.
Cappello GM. "The Splinter in Your Eye is the Best Magnifying Glass”. Detouring Media Literacy through Adorno’s Critical Theory. In Exploring the Roots of Digital and Media Literacy through Personal Narrative. 2016. pag. 107-125
Cappello, Gianna Maria. / "The Splinter in Your Eye is the Best Magnifying Glass”. Detouring Media Literacy through Adorno’s Critical Theory. Exploring the Roots of Digital and Media Literacy through Personal Narrative. 2016. pagg. 107-125
@inbook{2111dc1ce82c4011907f6643b4372d65,
title = "{"}The Splinter in Your Eye is the Best Magnifying Glass”. Detouring Media Literacy through Adorno’s Critical Theory",
abstract = "I have never fully bought (albeit often tempted to) into the simplistic and somewhat caricaturist versions of Theodor Adorno’s ideas about the cultural industry and the alienated consumer given by some supporters of the “active” audience. Even more so today, when digital social media seem to make participatory culture, creativity and active citizenship a dream coming true. I have always thought instead that, beyond the traps of binary thinking (powerful media vs active audience), there is a much more complex story to be told and that we, as cultural analysts and media literacy educators, need to patiently reconstruct – with all possible evidence coming from empirical data – the intricacy of the intersections and contradictions between the constraining discipline of structures at macro level and the empowering anti-discipline of individuals at micro level, between power as strategy and power as tactic, between society at large and the sitting room where I watch my favorite TV show, between culture as meaning and culture as action. Drawing from my personal encounters with Adorno’s writings, particularly those devoted to socio-musical enquiry, in this chapter I want to argue that these writings offer impressive keys to a perspective where much broader questions about the media in/as everyday life can be addressed: how media are defined as (and in relation to) social process, how media materials (including the ways they are interpreted and evaluated) are created, revised, and undercut with reference to specific social relations and social contexts of action, how media provide constraining and enabling resources for social agents, i. e., modes of conduct, evaluative judgments, social scenarios and institutional arrangements, emotional conditions and so forth. Ultimately, I want to argue that, by taking a detour through Adorno, media literacy education can better respond to the urgent need to (re)theorize and (re)politicize its discourses and practices as “negative dialectics”, as Adorno would put it.",
author = "Cappello, {Gianna Maria}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4399-1158-7",
pages = "107--125",
booktitle = "Exploring the Roots of Digital and Media Literacy through Personal Narrative",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - "The Splinter in Your Eye is the Best Magnifying Glass”. Detouring Media Literacy through Adorno’s Critical Theory

AU - Cappello, Gianna Maria

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - I have never fully bought (albeit often tempted to) into the simplistic and somewhat caricaturist versions of Theodor Adorno’s ideas about the cultural industry and the alienated consumer given by some supporters of the “active” audience. Even more so today, when digital social media seem to make participatory culture, creativity and active citizenship a dream coming true. I have always thought instead that, beyond the traps of binary thinking (powerful media vs active audience), there is a much more complex story to be told and that we, as cultural analysts and media literacy educators, need to patiently reconstruct – with all possible evidence coming from empirical data – the intricacy of the intersections and contradictions between the constraining discipline of structures at macro level and the empowering anti-discipline of individuals at micro level, between power as strategy and power as tactic, between society at large and the sitting room where I watch my favorite TV show, between culture as meaning and culture as action. Drawing from my personal encounters with Adorno’s writings, particularly those devoted to socio-musical enquiry, in this chapter I want to argue that these writings offer impressive keys to a perspective where much broader questions about the media in/as everyday life can be addressed: how media are defined as (and in relation to) social process, how media materials (including the ways they are interpreted and evaluated) are created, revised, and undercut with reference to specific social relations and social contexts of action, how media provide constraining and enabling resources for social agents, i. e., modes of conduct, evaluative judgments, social scenarios and institutional arrangements, emotional conditions and so forth. Ultimately, I want to argue that, by taking a detour through Adorno, media literacy education can better respond to the urgent need to (re)theorize and (re)politicize its discourses and practices as “negative dialectics”, as Adorno would put it.

AB - I have never fully bought (albeit often tempted to) into the simplistic and somewhat caricaturist versions of Theodor Adorno’s ideas about the cultural industry and the alienated consumer given by some supporters of the “active” audience. Even more so today, when digital social media seem to make participatory culture, creativity and active citizenship a dream coming true. I have always thought instead that, beyond the traps of binary thinking (powerful media vs active audience), there is a much more complex story to be told and that we, as cultural analysts and media literacy educators, need to patiently reconstruct – with all possible evidence coming from empirical data – the intricacy of the intersections and contradictions between the constraining discipline of structures at macro level and the empowering anti-discipline of individuals at micro level, between power as strategy and power as tactic, between society at large and the sitting room where I watch my favorite TV show, between culture as meaning and culture as action. Drawing from my personal encounters with Adorno’s writings, particularly those devoted to socio-musical enquiry, in this chapter I want to argue that these writings offer impressive keys to a perspective where much broader questions about the media in/as everyday life can be addressed: how media are defined as (and in relation to) social process, how media materials (including the ways they are interpreted and evaluated) are created, revised, and undercut with reference to specific social relations and social contexts of action, how media provide constraining and enabling resources for social agents, i. e., modes of conduct, evaluative judgments, social scenarios and institutional arrangements, emotional conditions and so forth. Ultimately, I want to argue that, by taking a detour through Adorno, media literacy education can better respond to the urgent need to (re)theorize and (re)politicize its discourses and practices as “negative dialectics”, as Adorno would put it.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/224105

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-4399-1158-7

SP - 107

EP - 125

BT - Exploring the Roots of Digital and Media Literacy through Personal Narrative

ER -