The Spherical Shape of Reason: Theoretical Implications in Kant’s Cosmopolitan Right

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

What is the meaning of the Kantian “right to visit”? What role does it play in his cosmopolitan project of peace? Kant scholars answer differently. Two opposite interpretive tendencies can be traced paradigmatically. One position points out freedom of circulation of the stranger as a condition of communication and peaceful coexistence between peoples. The other sees the constitutional limitation of the right to visit as a starting point for the creation of a global society. Kant’s philosophy offers elements that go beyond both interpretations. However, this only becomes apparent when the right to visit is read from a new perspective that goes beyond the specific space of the Kantian doctrine of right. The right to visit and the difference from the right to inhabit should be considered in connection with the broad architectural design of Kant’s thought. There is a deep connection between the right to visit as founded on common possession of the Earth, and the nature of reason as a field that only becomes our property insofar as we make ourselves able to grant others the same right to enter it. From this point of view we must all be at once hosts and guests.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)7-26
Numero di pagine20
RivistaSTUDIA KANTIANA
Volume15
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Immanuel Kant
Theoretical Reason
Peace
Architectural Design
Possession
Coexistence
Thought
Stranger
Communication
Philosophy
Doctrine

Cita questo

@article{a8826edd59634bb5b4d458fb01b2d0ba,
title = "The Spherical Shape of Reason: Theoretical Implications in Kant’s Cosmopolitan Right",
abstract = "What is the meaning of the Kantian “right to visit”? What role does it play in his cosmopolitan project of peace? Kant scholars answer differently. Two opposite interpretive tendencies can be traced paradigmatically. One position points out freedom of circulation of the stranger as a condition of communication and peaceful coexistence between peoples. The other sees the constitutional limitation of the right to visit as a starting point for the creation of a global society. Kant’s philosophy offers elements that go beyond both interpretations. However, this only becomes apparent when the right to visit is read from a new perspective that goes beyond the specific space of the Kantian doctrine of right. The right to visit and the difference from the right to inhabit should be considered in connection with the broad architectural design of Kant’s thought. There is a deep connection between the right to visit as founded on common possession of the Earth, and the nature of reason as a field that only becomes our property insofar as we make ourselves able to grant others the same right to enter it. From this point of view we must all be at once hosts and guests.",
keywords = "Kant, Reason, Deduction, Cosmopolitan Right, Hospitality",
author = "Angelo Cicatello",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "7--26",
journal = "STUDIA KANTIANA",
issn = "1518-403X",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Spherical Shape of Reason: Theoretical Implications in Kant’s Cosmopolitan Right

AU - Cicatello, Angelo

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - What is the meaning of the Kantian “right to visit”? What role does it play in his cosmopolitan project of peace? Kant scholars answer differently. Two opposite interpretive tendencies can be traced paradigmatically. One position points out freedom of circulation of the stranger as a condition of communication and peaceful coexistence between peoples. The other sees the constitutional limitation of the right to visit as a starting point for the creation of a global society. Kant’s philosophy offers elements that go beyond both interpretations. However, this only becomes apparent when the right to visit is read from a new perspective that goes beyond the specific space of the Kantian doctrine of right. The right to visit and the difference from the right to inhabit should be considered in connection with the broad architectural design of Kant’s thought. There is a deep connection between the right to visit as founded on common possession of the Earth, and the nature of reason as a field that only becomes our property insofar as we make ourselves able to grant others the same right to enter it. From this point of view we must all be at once hosts and guests.

AB - What is the meaning of the Kantian “right to visit”? What role does it play in his cosmopolitan project of peace? Kant scholars answer differently. Two opposite interpretive tendencies can be traced paradigmatically. One position points out freedom of circulation of the stranger as a condition of communication and peaceful coexistence between peoples. The other sees the constitutional limitation of the right to visit as a starting point for the creation of a global society. Kant’s philosophy offers elements that go beyond both interpretations. However, this only becomes apparent when the right to visit is read from a new perspective that goes beyond the specific space of the Kantian doctrine of right. The right to visit and the difference from the right to inhabit should be considered in connection with the broad architectural design of Kant’s thought. There is a deep connection between the right to visit as founded on common possession of the Earth, and the nature of reason as a field that only becomes our property insofar as we make ourselves able to grant others the same right to enter it. From this point of view we must all be at once hosts and guests.

KW - Kant, Reason, Deduction, Cosmopolitan Right, Hospitality

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/232504

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 7

EP - 26

JO - STUDIA KANTIANA

JF - STUDIA KANTIANA

SN - 1518-403X

ER -