The Concept of Exception: from Politics to Spatial Domain

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

During the last decade, the concept of the state of exception has branched out from the field of politics into other fields, including planning. Since planning is inseparable from politics and because planning laws are largely influenced by the nature of each political regime. The Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben was inspired by the German philosopher Carl Schmitt and consequently developed a theory of the state of exception. Schmitt pointed out that the context of exception is declared by a sovereign power and he tied this concept with dictatorship. Agamben, however, argues that the state of exception is not a special kind of law, but it is a zone of anomie, where all legal determinations are deactivated (Agamben, 2005: 50).According to Agamben, the state of siege (the state of exception in Agamben’s terminology) has its origins in France during the revolution when the constitution was suspended, and many other states also experienced it during the First World War. Recently, the paradigm of exception does not just occur when a hegemonic power becomes above the law; it also occurs when laws are made in order to suite the desire for control and subjection. From this perspective, the context of exception enhances the centrality of hegemonic power and it can be said that it is incompatible with the principles of justice. Hence, this context significantly raises questions of fundamental rights of citizenship, the right of the space, and spatial justice.Drawing on examples from many contexts around the world, starting from the most obvious cases where the paradigm of exception has been deployed for the purpose of subjection and control such as the case of occupied Palestine, this paper gradually highlights other contexts in which the paradigm of exception has been deployed. The occupying power “Israel” has deployed the model of exception to produce urban and regional confinements (prisons) in which Palestinians have experienced land confiscation, restriction of movement, and inaccessibility to private lands. This study shows that there are other examples of spaces of exception globally, but they have never been produced at the same level of oppression and torture as in the context of occupied Palestine. This study will consider the flow – and multiple declinations - of the ‘state of exception’ model in different contexts, such as the context of refugees and contexts of emergency that are related to different political regimes, Italy included.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)1-11
Numero di pagine11
RivistaDefault journal
Volume2
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

political regime
Law
politics
Palestine
paradigm
planning
occupying power
justice
theory of the state
anomie
fundamental right
torture
dictatorship
Western world
oppression
Palestinian
technical language
correctional institution
refugee
constitution

Cita questo

@article{fd47c87268c448e7a77c1624c7842c88,
title = "The Concept of Exception: from Politics to Spatial Domain",
abstract = "During the last decade, the concept of the state of exception has branched out from the field of politics into other fields, including planning. Since planning is inseparable from politics and because planning laws are largely influenced by the nature of each political regime. The Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben was inspired by the German philosopher Carl Schmitt and consequently developed a theory of the state of exception. Schmitt pointed out that the context of exception is declared by a sovereign power and he tied this concept with dictatorship. Agamben, however, argues that the state of exception is not a special kind of law, but it is a zone of anomie, where all legal determinations are deactivated (Agamben, 2005: 50).According to Agamben, the state of siege (the state of exception in Agamben’s terminology) has its origins in France during the revolution when the constitution was suspended, and many other states also experienced it during the First World War. Recently, the paradigm of exception does not just occur when a hegemonic power becomes above the law; it also occurs when laws are made in order to suite the desire for control and subjection. From this perspective, the context of exception enhances the centrality of hegemonic power and it can be said that it is incompatible with the principles of justice. Hence, this context significantly raises questions of fundamental rights of citizenship, the right of the space, and spatial justice.Drawing on examples from many contexts around the world, starting from the most obvious cases where the paradigm of exception has been deployed for the purpose of subjection and control such as the case of occupied Palestine, this paper gradually highlights other contexts in which the paradigm of exception has been deployed. The occupying power “Israel” has deployed the model of exception to produce urban and regional confinements (prisons) in which Palestinians have experienced land confiscation, restriction of movement, and inaccessibility to private lands. This study shows that there are other examples of spaces of exception globally, but they have never been produced at the same level of oppression and torture as in the context of occupied Palestine. This study will consider the flow – and multiple declinations - of the ‘state of exception’ model in different contexts, such as the context of refugees and contexts of emergency that are related to different political regimes, Italy included.",
author = "Halawani, {Abedal Rhma} and {Lo Piccolo}, Francesco",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Default journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Concept of Exception: from Politics to Spatial Domain

AU - Halawani, Abedal Rhma

AU - Lo Piccolo, Francesco

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - During the last decade, the concept of the state of exception has branched out from the field of politics into other fields, including planning. Since planning is inseparable from politics and because planning laws are largely influenced by the nature of each political regime. The Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben was inspired by the German philosopher Carl Schmitt and consequently developed a theory of the state of exception. Schmitt pointed out that the context of exception is declared by a sovereign power and he tied this concept with dictatorship. Agamben, however, argues that the state of exception is not a special kind of law, but it is a zone of anomie, where all legal determinations are deactivated (Agamben, 2005: 50).According to Agamben, the state of siege (the state of exception in Agamben’s terminology) has its origins in France during the revolution when the constitution was suspended, and many other states also experienced it during the First World War. Recently, the paradigm of exception does not just occur when a hegemonic power becomes above the law; it also occurs when laws are made in order to suite the desire for control and subjection. From this perspective, the context of exception enhances the centrality of hegemonic power and it can be said that it is incompatible with the principles of justice. Hence, this context significantly raises questions of fundamental rights of citizenship, the right of the space, and spatial justice.Drawing on examples from many contexts around the world, starting from the most obvious cases where the paradigm of exception has been deployed for the purpose of subjection and control such as the case of occupied Palestine, this paper gradually highlights other contexts in which the paradigm of exception has been deployed. The occupying power “Israel” has deployed the model of exception to produce urban and regional confinements (prisons) in which Palestinians have experienced land confiscation, restriction of movement, and inaccessibility to private lands. This study shows that there are other examples of spaces of exception globally, but they have never been produced at the same level of oppression and torture as in the context of occupied Palestine. This study will consider the flow – and multiple declinations - of the ‘state of exception’ model in different contexts, such as the context of refugees and contexts of emergency that are related to different political regimes, Italy included.

AB - During the last decade, the concept of the state of exception has branched out from the field of politics into other fields, including planning. Since planning is inseparable from politics and because planning laws are largely influenced by the nature of each political regime. The Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben was inspired by the German philosopher Carl Schmitt and consequently developed a theory of the state of exception. Schmitt pointed out that the context of exception is declared by a sovereign power and he tied this concept with dictatorship. Agamben, however, argues that the state of exception is not a special kind of law, but it is a zone of anomie, where all legal determinations are deactivated (Agamben, 2005: 50).According to Agamben, the state of siege (the state of exception in Agamben’s terminology) has its origins in France during the revolution when the constitution was suspended, and many other states also experienced it during the First World War. Recently, the paradigm of exception does not just occur when a hegemonic power becomes above the law; it also occurs when laws are made in order to suite the desire for control and subjection. From this perspective, the context of exception enhances the centrality of hegemonic power and it can be said that it is incompatible with the principles of justice. Hence, this context significantly raises questions of fundamental rights of citizenship, the right of the space, and spatial justice.Drawing on examples from many contexts around the world, starting from the most obvious cases where the paradigm of exception has been deployed for the purpose of subjection and control such as the case of occupied Palestine, this paper gradually highlights other contexts in which the paradigm of exception has been deployed. The occupying power “Israel” has deployed the model of exception to produce urban and regional confinements (prisons) in which Palestinians have experienced land confiscation, restriction of movement, and inaccessibility to private lands. This study shows that there are other examples of spaces of exception globally, but they have never been produced at the same level of oppression and torture as in the context of occupied Palestine. This study will consider the flow – and multiple declinations - of the ‘state of exception’ model in different contexts, such as the context of refugees and contexts of emergency that are related to different political regimes, Italy included.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/99496

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Default journal

JF - Default journal

ER -