TY - JOUR
T1 - The aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale
AU - Sara', Gianluca
AU - Mangano, Maria Cristina
AU - Bosch Belmar, Maria Del Mar
AU - Corbari, Laura
AU - Lucchese, Marta
AU - Berlino, Manuel
AU - Dong, Yun-Wei
AU - Liu, null
AU - Azaza, null
AU - Christofoletti, null
AU - Lebata-Ramos, null
AU - Mangano, Maria Cristina
AU - Dobroslavić, null
AU - Pita, null
AU - Giannetto, null
AU - Dineshram, null
AU - Shaltout, null
AU - Milisenda, null
AU - Choi, null
AU - Azra, null
AU - Bakiu, Rigers
AU - Celić, null
AU - Llorens, null
AU - Abouelfadl, null
AU - Galli, null
AU - Berlino, Manuel
AU - Luthman, null
AU - Lucchese, null
AU - Sevgili, null
AU - Liu, null
AU - Terzo, null
AU - Saidi, null
AU - Schultz, null
AU - Palomo, null
AU - Dionísio, null
AU - Lim, null
AU - Dong, null
AU - Qin, null
AU - Nogueira, null
AU - Grabowski, null
AU - Tan, null
AU - Pećarević, null
AU - Ravagnan, null
AU - Broitman, null
AU - Makridis, null
AU - Thiyagarajan, Vengatesen
AU - Babarro, null
AU - Sanchez-Jerez, Pablo
AU - Helmuth, null
AU - Glamuzina, Branko
AU - Troell, null
AU - Britz, null
AU - Carrington, Emily
AU - Buschmann, null
AU - Mirto, null
AU - Nogueira, null
AU - Grabowski, null
AU - Lim, null
AU - Ragg, null
AU - Mirto, Simone
AU - Terzo, Stella Maria Concetta
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high-quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems; extensive vs. intensive methods; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster-driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies.
AB - The COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high-quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems; extensive vs. intensive methods; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster-driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/531130
M3 - Article
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 127
SP - 98
EP - 110
JO - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
JF - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
ER -