SUBJETIVISMO ÉTICO Y OBJECIÓN DE CONCIENCIA

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

In this paper, I will present the conceptual differences between civil disobedience and conscientious objection, which have been depicted by liberal authors such as J. Rawls, J. Raz and in Spain by M. Gascón Abellán. I will argue that conscientious objection, as a practice that is distinct from civil disobedience and rests on a right to “moral privacy”, finds his justification on a subjectivist ethics or on a voluntarist account of natural law. I will try to show that in both cases, it is not clear how a) to justify legal norms that tries to balance the objectors’ claims and the opposite claims of rights’ holders b) to determine the seriousness of the ethical commitment of conscientious objectors, in order to avoid the risk of encouraging self-interested forms of objections. Finally, I will apply the arguments to the case of conscientious objection to the subject Educación para la Ciudadanía.
Lingua originaleSpanish
pagine (da-a)205-228
Numero di pagine24
RivistaDERECHOS Y LIBERTADES
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2018

Cita questo

SUBJETIVISMO ÉTICO Y OBJECIÓN DE CONCIENCIA. / Biondo, Francesco.

In: DERECHOS Y LIBERTADES, 2018, pag. 205-228.

Risultato della ricerca: Article

@article{0838f14fcad84b26945afc2049b63558,
title = "SUBJETIVISMO {\'E}TICO Y OBJECI{\'O}N DE CONCIENCIA",
abstract = "In this paper, I will present the conceptual differences between civil disobedience and conscientious objection, which have been depicted by liberal authors such as J. Rawls, J. Raz and in Spain by M. Gasc{\'o}n Abell{\'a}n. I will argue that conscientious objection, as a practice that is distinct from civil disobedience and rests on a right to “moral privacy”, finds his justification on a subjectivist ethics or on a voluntarist account of natural law. I will try to show that in both cases, it is not clear how a) to justify legal norms that tries to balance the objectors’ claims and the opposite claims of rights’ holders b) to determine the seriousness of the ethical commitment of conscientious objectors, in order to avoid the risk of encouraging self-interested forms of objections. Finally, I will apply the arguments to the case of conscientious objection to the subject Educaci{\'o}n para la Ciudadan{\'i}a.",
author = "Francesco Biondo",
year = "2018",
language = "Spanish",
pages = "205--228",
journal = "DERECHOS Y LIBERTADES",
issn = "1133-0937",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SUBJETIVISMO ÉTICO Y OBJECIÓN DE CONCIENCIA

AU - Biondo, Francesco

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In this paper, I will present the conceptual differences between civil disobedience and conscientious objection, which have been depicted by liberal authors such as J. Rawls, J. Raz and in Spain by M. Gascón Abellán. I will argue that conscientious objection, as a practice that is distinct from civil disobedience and rests on a right to “moral privacy”, finds his justification on a subjectivist ethics or on a voluntarist account of natural law. I will try to show that in both cases, it is not clear how a) to justify legal norms that tries to balance the objectors’ claims and the opposite claims of rights’ holders b) to determine the seriousness of the ethical commitment of conscientious objectors, in order to avoid the risk of encouraging self-interested forms of objections. Finally, I will apply the arguments to the case of conscientious objection to the subject Educación para la Ciudadanía.

AB - In this paper, I will present the conceptual differences between civil disobedience and conscientious objection, which have been depicted by liberal authors such as J. Rawls, J. Raz and in Spain by M. Gascón Abellán. I will argue that conscientious objection, as a practice that is distinct from civil disobedience and rests on a right to “moral privacy”, finds his justification on a subjectivist ethics or on a voluntarist account of natural law. I will try to show that in both cases, it is not clear how a) to justify legal norms that tries to balance the objectors’ claims and the opposite claims of rights’ holders b) to determine the seriousness of the ethical commitment of conscientious objectors, in order to avoid the risk of encouraging self-interested forms of objections. Finally, I will apply the arguments to the case of conscientious objection to the subject Educación para la Ciudadanía.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/337510

M3 - Article

SP - 205

EP - 228

JO - DERECHOS Y LIBERTADES

JF - DERECHOS Y LIBERTADES

SN - 1133-0937

ER -