Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastric Resection for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors >5 cm: A Size-Matched and Location-Matched Comparison

Pietro Genova, Aurelien Amiot, Cecile Charpy, Francois Legou, Mara Disabato, Daniel Azoulay, Pietro Genova, Nicola De'Angelis, Ali Chahrour, Francesco Brunetti, Ajay P. Belgaumkar

Risultato della ricerca: Articlepeer review

4 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared robotic (RR) and laparoscopic resection (LR) for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach >5 cm. Twelve consecutive patients who underwent RR from 2012 to 2015 were matched for tumor size and location with 24 patients who underwent LR from 2000 to 2012. The median tumor size was 7.1 cm (range, 5.5 to 11.5). GISTs were resected by wedge resection (91.7%) or distal gastrectomy. The median RR operative time was longer than that of LR (162.5 vs. 130 min, respectively; P=0.004). Only 1 LR patient required conversion. The time to flatus and hospital stay were similar between groups. Overall, 3 patients developed minor postoperative complications that were medically treated. Mortality was nil. All resections were R0. No difference was observed in the incidence of recurrence. RR was significantly more expensive (+21.6%) than LR. RR appears to be safe and feasible for GISTs>5 cm, but is associated with longer operative times and greater costs.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)65-71
Numero di pagine7
RivistaSURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES
Volume27
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastric Resection for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors >5 cm: A Size-Matched and Location-Matched Comparison'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo