TY - JOUR
T1 - Riflessioni su D. 50.16.130 (Ulp. 2 ad leg. Iul. et Pap.)
AU - Terranova, Francesca
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The research focuses on analysis of a well-known fragment of Justinian’s Digesta: 50.16.130 (Ulp. 2ad leg. Iul. et Pap.). Formerly, several scholars have raised many doubts regard to its authenticity. The author’s basic idea is that there are not solid issues in favor of the hypothesis that the fragment is not genuine. On the contrary, both the examination of the terminology, used in the fragment, and the comparison between D. 50.16.130 and other sources (in particular: D. 38.16.1 pr.; 5.3.1 e 3; Tit. Ulp. 11.2-3; 11.14) might provide interesting evidences in support of its classical content.
AB - The research focuses on analysis of a well-known fragment of Justinian’s Digesta: 50.16.130 (Ulp. 2ad leg. Iul. et Pap.). Formerly, several scholars have raised many doubts regard to its authenticity. The author’s basic idea is that there are not solid issues in favor of the hypothesis that the fragment is not genuine. On the contrary, both the examination of the terminology, used in the fragment, and the comparison between D. 50.16.130 and other sources (in particular: D. 38.16.1 pr.; 5.3.1 e 3; Tit. Ulp. 11.2-3; 11.14) might provide interesting evidences in support of its classical content.
KW - Lex XII Tabularum
KW - successione ab intestato
(o ex lege)
KW - successione ex testamento
KW - ‘nemo pro parte testatus pro parte intestatus decedere potest ’
KW - Lex XII Tabularum
KW - successione ab intestato
(o ex lege)
KW - successione ex testamento
KW - ‘nemo pro parte testatus pro parte intestatus decedere potest ’
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/88624
M3 - Article
VL - 56
SP - 159
EP - 179
JO - ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO
JF - ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO
SN - 1972-8441
ER -