Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) versus CMF followed by epirubicin in patients with node-negative or 1-3 node-positive rapidly proliferating breast cancer

Maria Rosaria Valerio, Patrizia Serra, Andrea Rocca, Francesco Boccardo, Editta Baldini, Mario De Lena, Paola Bonginelli, Lorenzo Gianni, Francesco Schittulli, Francesco Boccardo, Marina Faedi, Emanuela Scarpi, Roberta Maltoni, Amelia Tienghi, Nicoletta Biglia, Riccardo Ponzone, Dino Amadori, Angelo Paradiso, Laura Amaducci, Mario BrandiRosella Silvestrini

Risultato della ricerca: Article

13 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) have proven highly effective in rapidly proliferating breast cancer (RPBC). It has also been seen that sequential administration of doxorubicin and CMF is superior to their alternation, especially in indolent tumors. In a phase III study, we evaluated whether adjuvant epirubicin (E) followed by CMF is superior to the inverse sequence in RPBC. Patients with node-negative or 1-3 node-positive RPBC (Thymidine Labeling Index > 3% or histological grade 3 or S-phase > 10% or Ki67 > 20%) were randomized to receive E (100 mg/m(2) i.v. d1, q21 days for 4 cycles) followed by CMF (600, 40, 600 mg/m(2) i.v. d1 and 8, q28 days for 4 cycles) (E → CMF) or CMF followed by E (CMF → E) or CMF for 6 cycles. From November 1997 to December 2004, 1066 patients were enrolled: E → CMF 440, CMF → E 438, and CMF 188. At a median follow-up of 69 months, 5-year OS was 91% (95% CI 88-94) for E → CMF and 93% (95% CI 90-95) for CMF → E, with adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% CI 0.58-1.35), and DFS was 80% in both arms, with adjusted hazard ratio of 0.99 (95% CI 0.73-1.33, Cox model). Adverse events were similar, apart from a higher rate of neutropenia in the CMF → E arm. No important differences in clinical outcome were observed between the two different sequences, making both a valid option in early breast cancer. Further molecular characterization of the tumors might help to identify subgroups achieving higher benefit from either sequence.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)775-784
Numero di pagine10
RivistaBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume125
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cita questo

Valerio, M. R., Serra, P., Rocca, A., Boccardo, F., Baldini, E., De Lena, M., Bonginelli, P., Gianni, L., Schittulli, F., Boccardo, F., Faedi, M., Scarpi, E., Maltoni, R., Tienghi, A., Biglia, N., Ponzone, R., Amadori, D., Paradiso, A., Amaducci, L., ... Silvestrini, R. (2011). Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) versus CMF followed by epirubicin in patients with node-negative or 1-3 node-positive rapidly proliferating breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 125, 775-784.