Prognostic implications of extranodal extension in node-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nicola Veronese, Enzo Manzato, Nicola Veronese, Alessia Nottegar, Claudio Luchini, Aldo Scarpa, Aldo Scarpa, Marco Solmi, Paola Capelli, Giuseppe Sergi

Risultato della ricerca: Articlepeer review

39 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vulva is the fourth most common gynecological cancer, usually staged with the TNM or FIGO systems. Since 2009, FIGO staging has taken the extranodal extension (ENE) of lymph node metastases into account. ENE is defined as the spread of a lymph node metastasis into surrounding soft tissue. Although the TNM and FIGO systems acknowledge the importance of ENE in SCC, no comprehensive studies have analyzed the prognostic impact of this parameter. We therefore queried the PubMed and SCOPUS databases from their inception up until 04/01/2015, adopting no language restrictions: all prospective studies reporting on prognostic parameters in patients with vulvar SCC, and comparing participants with and without ENE were eligible for our analysis. Data were summarized using risk ratios (RR) for the number of deaths/recurrences and hazard ratios (HR) for the time-dependent risk related to ENE positivity, adjusting for potential confounders. Among 859 hits, 13 studies were found eligible and were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with ENE-negative (ENE-) cases, the ENE-positive (ENE+) patients had significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality (6 studies: RR = 3.18; 95%CI: 2.02-5.00, p < 0.0001, I2 = 56%), cancer-specific mortality (3 studies: RR = 2.03; 95%CI: 1.12-3.69, p = 0.02, I2 = 80%), and recurrence (4 studies: RR = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.61-3.76, p < 0.0001, I2 = 57%). Using HRs after adjusting for potential confounders, ENE + carried a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (6 studies: HR = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.73-5.48, p < 0.0001, I2 = 66%), and recurrence (5 studies: HR = 3.93, 95%CI: 2.33-6.62, p < 0.0001, I2 = 28%). Our meta-analysis clarifies the prognostic significance of ENE in vulvar SCC, also pointing to its implications for gross sampling, histology and oncological staging. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.All rights reserved.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)60-65
Numero di pagine6
RivistaSurgical Oncology
Volume25
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cita questo