The main topic of this research was to evaluate the effect in the performance of stochastic landslide susceptibility models, produced by differences between the triggering events of the calibration and validation datasets. In the Caldera Ilopango area (El Salvador), MARS (multivariate adaptive regression splines)-based susceptibility modeling was applied using a set of physical–environmental predictors and two remotely recognized landslide inventories: one dated at 2003 (1503 landslides), which was the result of a normal rainfall season, and one which was produced by the combined effect of the Ida hurricane and the 96E tropical depression in 2009 (2237 landslides). Both the event inventories included shallow debris—flow or slide landslides, which involved the weathered mantle of the pyroclastic rocks that largely outcrop in the study area. To this aim, different model building and validation strategies were applied (self-validation, forward and backward chrono-validations), and their performances evaluated both through cutoff-dependent and -independent metrics. All of the tested models produced largely acceptable AUC (area under curve) values, albeit a loss in the predictive performance from self-validation to chrono-validation was observed. Besides, in terms of positive/negative predictions, some critical differences arose: using the 2009 extreme landslide inventory for calibration resulted in higher sensitivity but lower specificity; conversely, using the 2003 normal trigger landslide calibration inventory led to higher specificity but lower sensitivity, with relevant increase in type-II errors. These results suggest the need for investigating the extent of such effects, taking multitrigger intensities inventories as a standard procedure for susceptibility assessment in areas where extreme events potentially occur.
|Numero di pagine||16|
|Rivista||Environmental Earth Sciences|
|Stato di pubblicazione||Published - 2019|
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes