Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Anesthesiology

Antonino Giarratano, Cesare Gregoretti, Santi Maurizio Raineri, Andrea Cortegiani, Filippo Sanfilippo, Federico Longhini, Filippo Sanfilippo

Risultato della ricerca: Article

12 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Predatory publishing is an exploitative fraudulent open-access publishing model that applies charges under the pretense of legitimate publishing operations without actually providing the editorial services associated with legitimate journals. The aim of this study was to analyze this phenomenon in the field of anesthesiology and related specialties (intensive care, critical and respiratory medicine, pain medicine, and emergency care). Two authors independently surveyed a freely accessible, constantly updated version of the original Beall lists of potential, possible, or probable predatory publishers and standalone journals. We identified 212 journals from 83 publishers, and the total number of published articles was 12,871. The reported location of most publishers was in the United States. In 43% of cases (37/84), the reported location was judged as "unreliable" after being checked using the 3-dimensional view in Google Maps. Six journals were indexed in PubMed. Although 6 journals were declared to be indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals, none were actually registered. The median article processing charge was 634.5 US dollars (interquartile range, 275-1005 US dollars). Several journals reported false indexing/registration in the Committee on Publication Ethics and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors registries and Google Scholar. Only 32% (67/212) reported the name of the editor-in-chief. Rules for ethics/scientific misconduct were reported in only 24% of cases (50/212). In conclusion, potential or probable predatory open-access publishers and journals are widely present in the broad field of anesthesiology and related specialties. Researchers should carefully check journals' reported information, including location, editorial board, indexing, and rules for ethics when submitting their manuscripts to open-access journals.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)182-187
Numero di pagine6
RivistaAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume128
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Anesthesiology
Ethics
Scientific Misconduct
Open Access Publishing
Directories
Pulmonary Medicine
Ethics Committees
Manuscripts
Emergency Medical Services
Critical Care
PubMed
Names
Registries
Publications
Research Personnel
Medicine
Pain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cita questo

Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Anesthesiology. / Giarratano, Antonino; Gregoretti, Cesare; Raineri, Santi Maurizio; Cortegiani, Andrea; Sanfilippo, Filippo; Longhini, Federico; Sanfilippo, Filippo.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 128, 2018, pag. 182-187.

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Giarratano, Antonino ; Gregoretti, Cesare ; Raineri, Santi Maurizio ; Cortegiani, Andrea ; Sanfilippo, Filippo ; Longhini, Federico ; Sanfilippo, Filippo. / Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Anesthesiology. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2018 ; Vol. 128. pagg. 182-187.
@article{67802ad40385424b8c61b27b51dd745c,
title = "Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Anesthesiology",
abstract = "Predatory publishing is an exploitative fraudulent open-access publishing model that applies charges under the pretense of legitimate publishing operations without actually providing the editorial services associated with legitimate journals. The aim of this study was to analyze this phenomenon in the field of anesthesiology and related specialties (intensive care, critical and respiratory medicine, pain medicine, and emergency care). Two authors independently surveyed a freely accessible, constantly updated version of the original Beall lists of potential, possible, or probable predatory publishers and standalone journals. We identified 212 journals from 83 publishers, and the total number of published articles was 12,871. The reported location of most publishers was in the United States. In 43{\%} of cases (37/84), the reported location was judged as {"}unreliable{"} after being checked using the 3-dimensional view in Google Maps. Six journals were indexed in PubMed. Although 6 journals were declared to be indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals, none were actually registered. The median article processing charge was 634.5 US dollars (interquartile range, 275-1005 US dollars). Several journals reported false indexing/registration in the Committee on Publication Ethics and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors registries and Google Scholar. Only 32{\%} (67/212) reported the name of the editor-in-chief. Rules for ethics/scientific misconduct were reported in only 24{\%} of cases (50/212). In conclusion, potential or probable predatory open-access publishers and journals are widely present in the broad field of anesthesiology and related specialties. Researchers should carefully check journals' reported information, including location, editorial board, indexing, and rules for ethics when submitting their manuscripts to open-access journals.",
author = "Antonino Giarratano and Cesare Gregoretti and Raineri, {Santi Maurizio} and Andrea Cortegiani and Filippo Sanfilippo and Federico Longhini and Filippo Sanfilippo",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "128",
pages = "182--187",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Anesthesiology

AU - Giarratano, Antonino

AU - Gregoretti, Cesare

AU - Raineri, Santi Maurizio

AU - Cortegiani, Andrea

AU - Sanfilippo, Filippo

AU - Longhini, Federico

AU - Sanfilippo, Filippo

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Predatory publishing is an exploitative fraudulent open-access publishing model that applies charges under the pretense of legitimate publishing operations without actually providing the editorial services associated with legitimate journals. The aim of this study was to analyze this phenomenon in the field of anesthesiology and related specialties (intensive care, critical and respiratory medicine, pain medicine, and emergency care). Two authors independently surveyed a freely accessible, constantly updated version of the original Beall lists of potential, possible, or probable predatory publishers and standalone journals. We identified 212 journals from 83 publishers, and the total number of published articles was 12,871. The reported location of most publishers was in the United States. In 43% of cases (37/84), the reported location was judged as "unreliable" after being checked using the 3-dimensional view in Google Maps. Six journals were indexed in PubMed. Although 6 journals were declared to be indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals, none were actually registered. The median article processing charge was 634.5 US dollars (interquartile range, 275-1005 US dollars). Several journals reported false indexing/registration in the Committee on Publication Ethics and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors registries and Google Scholar. Only 32% (67/212) reported the name of the editor-in-chief. Rules for ethics/scientific misconduct were reported in only 24% of cases (50/212). In conclusion, potential or probable predatory open-access publishers and journals are widely present in the broad field of anesthesiology and related specialties. Researchers should carefully check journals' reported information, including location, editorial board, indexing, and rules for ethics when submitting their manuscripts to open-access journals.

AB - Predatory publishing is an exploitative fraudulent open-access publishing model that applies charges under the pretense of legitimate publishing operations without actually providing the editorial services associated with legitimate journals. The aim of this study was to analyze this phenomenon in the field of anesthesiology and related specialties (intensive care, critical and respiratory medicine, pain medicine, and emergency care). Two authors independently surveyed a freely accessible, constantly updated version of the original Beall lists of potential, possible, or probable predatory publishers and standalone journals. We identified 212 journals from 83 publishers, and the total number of published articles was 12,871. The reported location of most publishers was in the United States. In 43% of cases (37/84), the reported location was judged as "unreliable" after being checked using the 3-dimensional view in Google Maps. Six journals were indexed in PubMed. Although 6 journals were declared to be indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals, none were actually registered. The median article processing charge was 634.5 US dollars (interquartile range, 275-1005 US dollars). Several journals reported false indexing/registration in the Committee on Publication Ethics and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors registries and Google Scholar. Only 32% (67/212) reported the name of the editor-in-chief. Rules for ethics/scientific misconduct were reported in only 24% of cases (50/212). In conclusion, potential or probable predatory open-access publishers and journals are widely present in the broad field of anesthesiology and related specialties. Researchers should carefully check journals' reported information, including location, editorial board, indexing, and rules for ethics when submitting their manuscripts to open-access journals.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/314606

M3 - Article

VL - 128

SP - 182

EP - 187

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

ER -