TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase I-II trial of gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapies for small cell lung cancer in elderly patients with performance status 0-2: The G-Step trial
AU - Valerio, Maria Rosaria
AU - Spatafora, Mario
AU - Piccirillo, Maria Carmela
AU - Ceribelli, Anna
AU - Di Maio, Massimo
AU - Signoriello, Simona
AU - Rossi, Antonio
AU - Favaretto, Adolfo
AU - De Maio, Ermelinda
AU - Filipazzi, Virginio
AU - Isa, Luciano
AU - Gamucci, Teresa
AU - Maione, Paolo
AU - Iaffaioli, Rosario Vincenzo
AU - Barletta, Emiddio
AU - Barbera, Santi
AU - Morabito, Alessandro
AU - Rocco, Gaetano
AU - Perrone, Francesco
AU - Gridelli, Cesare
AU - Vecchione, Aldo
AU - Gallo, Ciro
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Introduction: Treatment of elderly patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is based on scanty evidence. Methods: Patients with extensive SCLC, age >70 years, and performance status 0-2 were eligible for a study looking for optimal two-drug combination of gemcitabine (Gem) with vinorelbine (Vin), etoposide (Eto), cisplatin (Cis), or carboplatin (Car). Gemcitabine dose was the same (1000 mg/m2, days 1-8) in all combinations. A two-stage minimax flexible design for response was applied to GemVin combination (Vin 25 mg/m2, days 1-8). For GemCar, GemCis, GemEto, a phase I-II Bayesian design was applied, looking for the optimal dose of the partner drugs. Objective response rate ≥60% and unacceptable toxicity ≤25% were required to define a combination worthy of further studies. Results: Median age of 78 eligible patients was 74 years. GemVin produced a 36.7% objective response rate. GemEto and GemCis arms were found not sufficiently active. GemCar produced 16 responses (14 with area under the curve [AUC] 3.5 and 2 with AUC 4.0) in 26 patients (61.5%) and 6 cases of unacceptable toxicity (3 at each Car dose). Conclusions: In elderly patients with extensive SCLC, GemVin, GemEto, and GemCis are not enough active and do not merit further studies. Gem plus Car might deserve further attention. © 2011 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.
AB - Introduction: Treatment of elderly patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is based on scanty evidence. Methods: Patients with extensive SCLC, age >70 years, and performance status 0-2 were eligible for a study looking for optimal two-drug combination of gemcitabine (Gem) with vinorelbine (Vin), etoposide (Eto), cisplatin (Cis), or carboplatin (Car). Gemcitabine dose was the same (1000 mg/m2, days 1-8) in all combinations. A two-stage minimax flexible design for response was applied to GemVin combination (Vin 25 mg/m2, days 1-8). For GemCar, GemCis, GemEto, a phase I-II Bayesian design was applied, looking for the optimal dose of the partner drugs. Objective response rate ≥60% and unacceptable toxicity ≤25% were required to define a combination worthy of further studies. Results: Median age of 78 eligible patients was 74 years. GemVin produced a 36.7% objective response rate. GemEto and GemCis arms were found not sufficiently active. GemCar produced 16 responses (14 with area under the curve [AUC] 3.5 and 2 with AUC 4.0) in 26 patients (61.5%) and 6 cases of unacceptable toxicity (3 at each Car dose). Conclusions: In elderly patients with extensive SCLC, GemVin, GemEto, and GemCis are not enough active and do not merit further studies. Gem plus Car might deserve further attention. © 2011 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/368595
UR - https://www.jto.org/article/S1556-0864(15)31783-4/fulltext
M3 - Article
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 7
SP - 233
EP - 242
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
ER -