Peithò o l’argomentazione relazionale al servizio della comunità nella Grecia antica

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

In the Greek world, in the face of the dialectical argument of ‘intellectuals’, which unfolds in the discussion ideally without time limits with individuals (present or virtual) and plays with their agreement all steps deemed necessary to arrive at “truth”, the persuasive argument of political rhetoric, expressed monologically in a limited time and in the face of a collective audience, always has the need to maintain a good relation with this last one. The main features of this type of argument are absence of hierarchy, community dimension, pluralism, negotiation and mediation skills, and reception of the listener. And as the risk of dialectics is the eristic (but also the authoritarian pretense of impartiality disguised as science), so that of rhetoric is the populist seduction: to overcome this difficulty, the Greeks have tried to indicate some rules.
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)43-52
Numero di pagine10
RivistaRIVISTA ITALIANA DI FILOSOFIA DEL LINGUAGGIO
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2016

Cita questo

@article{519dab63099941b99ca7482849b79461,
title = "Peith{\`o} o l’argomentazione relazionale al servizio della comunit{\`a} nella Grecia antica",
abstract = "In the Greek world, in the face of the dialectical argument of ‘intellectuals’, which unfolds in the discussion ideally without time limits with individuals (present or virtual) and plays with their agreement all steps deemed necessary to arrive at “truth”, the persuasive argument of political rhetoric, expressed monologically in a limited time and in the face of a collective audience, always has the need to maintain a good relation with this last one. The main features of this type of argument are absence of hierarchy, community dimension, pluralism, negotiation and mediation skills, and reception of the listener. And as the risk of dialectics is the eristic (but also the authoritarian pretense of impartiality disguised as science), so that of rhetoric is the populist seduction: to overcome this difficulty, the Greeks have tried to indicate some rules.",
author = "Andrea Cozzo",
year = "2016",
language = "Italian",
pages = "43--52",
journal = "RIVISTA ITALIANA DI FILOSOFIA DEL LINGUAGGIO",
issn = "2036-6728",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peithò o l’argomentazione relazionale al servizio della comunità nella Grecia antica

AU - Cozzo, Andrea

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In the Greek world, in the face of the dialectical argument of ‘intellectuals’, which unfolds in the discussion ideally without time limits with individuals (present or virtual) and plays with their agreement all steps deemed necessary to arrive at “truth”, the persuasive argument of political rhetoric, expressed monologically in a limited time and in the face of a collective audience, always has the need to maintain a good relation with this last one. The main features of this type of argument are absence of hierarchy, community dimension, pluralism, negotiation and mediation skills, and reception of the listener. And as the risk of dialectics is the eristic (but also the authoritarian pretense of impartiality disguised as science), so that of rhetoric is the populist seduction: to overcome this difficulty, the Greeks have tried to indicate some rules.

AB - In the Greek world, in the face of the dialectical argument of ‘intellectuals’, which unfolds in the discussion ideally without time limits with individuals (present or virtual) and plays with their agreement all steps deemed necessary to arrive at “truth”, the persuasive argument of political rhetoric, expressed monologically in a limited time and in the face of a collective audience, always has the need to maintain a good relation with this last one. The main features of this type of argument are absence of hierarchy, community dimension, pluralism, negotiation and mediation skills, and reception of the listener. And as the risk of dialectics is the eristic (but also the authoritarian pretense of impartiality disguised as science), so that of rhetoric is the populist seduction: to overcome this difficulty, the Greeks have tried to indicate some rules.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/229726

M3 - Article

SP - 43

EP - 52

JO - RIVISTA ITALIANA DI FILOSOFIA DEL LINGUAGGIO

JF - RIVISTA ITALIANA DI FILOSOFIA DEL LINGUAGGIO

SN - 2036-6728

ER -