TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Insights from multimodality imaging and electrocardiography. A brief review
AU - Corrado, Egle
AU - Novo, Salvatore
AU - Novo, Giuseppina
AU - Assennato, Pasquale
AU - Novo, Salvatore
AU - Carità, Patrizia
AU - Coppola, Giuseppe
AU - Novo, Giuseppina
AU - Guglielmo, Marco
AU - Ciaramitaro, Gianfranco
AU - Bontempi, Luca
AU - Assennato, Pasquale
AU - Curnis, Antonio
AU - Pontone, Gianluca
AU - Corrado, Egle
AU - Carita', Patrizia
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a successful strategy for heart failure (HF) patients. The pre-requisite for the response is the evidence of electrical dyssynchrony on the surface electrocardiogram usually as left bundle branch block (LBBB). Non-response to CRT is a significant problem in clinical practice. Patient selection, inadequate delivery and sub-optimal left ventricle lead position may be important causes. Objectives In an effort to improve CRT response multimodality imaging (especially echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance) could play a decisive role and extensive literature has been published on the matter. However, we are so far from routinary use in clinical practice. Electrocardiography (with respect to left ventricle capture and QRS narrowing) may represent a simple and low cost approach for early prediction of potential non-responder, with immediate practical implications. Conclusion This brief review covers the current recommendations for CRT in HF patients with particular attention to the potential benefits of multimodality imaging and electrocardiography in improving response rate.
AB - Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a successful strategy for heart failure (HF) patients. The pre-requisite for the response is the evidence of electrical dyssynchrony on the surface electrocardiogram usually as left bundle branch block (LBBB). Non-response to CRT is a significant problem in clinical practice. Patient selection, inadequate delivery and sub-optimal left ventricle lead position may be important causes. Objectives In an effort to improve CRT response multimodality imaging (especially echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance) could play a decisive role and extensive literature has been published on the matter. However, we are so far from routinary use in clinical practice. Electrocardiography (with respect to left ventricle capture and QRS narrowing) may represent a simple and low cost approach for early prediction of potential non-responder, with immediate practical implications. Conclusion This brief review covers the current recommendations for CRT in HF patients with particular attention to the potential benefits of multimodality imaging and electrocardiography in improving response rate.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/214939
UR - http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcard
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 225
SP - 402
EP - 407
JO - European Journal of Cardiology
JF - European Journal of Cardiology
ER -