NELLA “REVISIONE INFINITA” DEL PROCESSO CONTRADA I NODI IRRISOLTI DELL’ESECUZIONE DELLE SENTENZE CEDU E DEL CONCORSO ESTERNO NEL REATO ASSOCIATIVO

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

The rejection of the request for revision of the Contrada trial once again focuses attention on the issues of legal certainty/foreseeability of “external participation in criminal association” cases and the execution of judgements by the ECHR. Retracing the debate in the field we find supposed appropriate strategies for achieving the “highest level of rights protection” as part of the “changeable” Res Judicata.
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)3432-3459
Numero di pagine28
RivistaCASSAZIONE PENALE
VolumeIX
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2016

Cita questo

@article{8804061efaa142a799443fab0e52b42a,
title = "NELLA “REVISIONE INFINITA” DEL PROCESSO CONTRADA I NODI IRRISOLTI DELL’ESECUZIONE DELLE SENTENZE CEDU E DEL CONCORSO ESTERNO NEL REATO ASSOCIATIVO",
abstract = "The rejection of the request for revision of the Contrada trial once again focuses attention on the issues of legal certainty/foreseeability of “external participation in criminal association” cases and the execution of judgements by the ECHR. Retracing the debate in the field we find supposed appropriate strategies for achieving the “highest level of rights protection” as part of the “changeable” Res Judicata.",
author = "Paola Maggio",
year = "2016",
language = "Italian",
volume = "IX",
pages = "3432--3459",
journal = "CASSAZIONE PENALE",
issn = "1125-856X",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - NELLA “REVISIONE INFINITA” DEL PROCESSO CONTRADA I NODI IRRISOLTI DELL’ESECUZIONE DELLE SENTENZE CEDU E DEL CONCORSO ESTERNO NEL REATO ASSOCIATIVO

AU - Maggio, Paola

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The rejection of the request for revision of the Contrada trial once again focuses attention on the issues of legal certainty/foreseeability of “external participation in criminal association” cases and the execution of judgements by the ECHR. Retracing the debate in the field we find supposed appropriate strategies for achieving the “highest level of rights protection” as part of the “changeable” Res Judicata.

AB - The rejection of the request for revision of the Contrada trial once again focuses attention on the issues of legal certainty/foreseeability of “external participation in criminal association” cases and the execution of judgements by the ECHR. Retracing the debate in the field we find supposed appropriate strategies for achieving the “highest level of rights protection” as part of the “changeable” Res Judicata.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/217206

M3 - Article

VL - IX

SP - 3432

EP - 3459

JO - CASSAZIONE PENALE

JF - CASSAZIONE PENALE

SN - 1125-856X

ER -