The “Judge of the laws” delivers to the Parliament punctuals directives to give concreteness to the reasonable duration of the trial. What is at stake is the right to renew the evidence in the event of a change of the judge, which is drastically reduced to prevent it from being used merely for dilatory purposes. The Author criticizes the decision in question, fearing a dangerous drift: the renewal only of the “useful” evidence.
|Numero di pagine||15|
|Rivista||PROCESSO PENALE E GIUSTIZIA|
|Stato di pubblicazione||Published - 2020|