Abstract

Purpose of our study was to evaluate the behavior of the lumbar spine of young athletes in the supine and standing position, taking into account all postural changes that the spine undergoes during physiological load, any alterations and any discrepancies in the detection of pathology between the two positions.Between August 2008 and October 2009, we evaluated 40 sportsman (20 men and 20 women) with symptoms of lumbar pain.All subjects underwent MRI with a dedicated scanner of 0.25 Tesla (G-Scan, Esaote Biomedica, Genoa, Italy) either in the conventional supine position, either in the weight-bearing position. Spin echo T1w and fast spin echo T2w images were acquired with a dedicated receiving coil for the lumbar spine (group B). Three radiologists, blinded on history and clinical examination of subjects, assessed, in consensus, variations of lumbar lordosis angle, of lumbo-sacral angle and presence of pathology on images acquired in both positions, in different sequences and in different planes.Conventional supine MRI was positive for pathology 30/40 while weight-bearing MRI was positive in 39/40 respectively.In particular, the evaluation in the weight-bearing position allowed, in 9 cases to detect diseases that would have remained unrecognized if the evaluation had been performed only in the supine position. Compared to MRI in the supine position, weight-bearing MRI showed changes of the lumbo-sacral angle in 31/40 subjects and of lumbar lordosis angle in all 40 subjects. Imaging the lumbar spine in weight-bearing position with a dedicated MRI scanner and a dedicated coil might allow identification of pathology that may be overlooked if imaging patients only in the supine position.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)241-252
Numero di pagine12
RivistaMEDICINA DELLO SPORT
Volume66(2)
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Supine Position
Weight-Bearing
Athletes
Spine
Pathology
Lordosis
Posture
Italy
Consensus
History
Pain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cita questo

@article{b62585a0623e4c539b1bbc41208346d3,
title = "MRI evaluation of spine abnormalities in the supine position and under physiological load in athletes with a dedicated MR scanner",
abstract = "Purpose of our study was to evaluate the behavior of the lumbar spine of young athletes in the supine and standing position, taking into account all postural changes that the spine undergoes during physiological load, any alterations and any discrepancies in the detection of pathology between the two positions.Between August 2008 and October 2009, we evaluated 40 sportsman (20 men and 20 women) with symptoms of lumbar pain.All subjects underwent MRI with a dedicated scanner of 0.25 Tesla (G-Scan, Esaote Biomedica, Genoa, Italy) either in the conventional supine position, either in the weight-bearing position. Spin echo T1w and fast spin echo T2w images were acquired with a dedicated receiving coil for the lumbar spine (group B). Three radiologists, blinded on history and clinical examination of subjects, assessed, in consensus, variations of lumbar lordosis angle, of lumbo-sacral angle and presence of pathology on images acquired in both positions, in different sequences and in different planes.Conventional supine MRI was positive for pathology 30/40 while weight-bearing MRI was positive in 39/40 respectively.In particular, the evaluation in the weight-bearing position allowed, in 9 cases to detect diseases that would have remained unrecognized if the evaluation had been performed only in the supine position. Compared to MRI in the supine position, weight-bearing MRI showed changes of the lumbo-sacral angle in 31/40 subjects and of lumbar lordosis angle in all 40 subjects. Imaging the lumbar spine in weight-bearing position with a dedicated MRI scanner and a dedicated coil might allow identification of pathology that may be overlooked if imaging patients only in the supine position.",
author = "Michele D'Arienzo and Antonino Sanfilippo and Raffaello Sutera and Massimo Midiri and Domenica Matranga and Angelo Iovane and Giuseppe Francavilla",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "66(2)",
pages = "241--252",
journal = "MEDICINA DELLO SPORT",
issn = "0025-7826",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MRI evaluation of spine abnormalities in the supine position and under physiological load in athletes with a dedicated MR scanner

AU - D'Arienzo, Michele

AU - Sanfilippo, Antonino

AU - Sutera, Raffaello

AU - Midiri, Massimo

AU - Matranga, Domenica

AU - Iovane, Angelo

AU - Francavilla, Giuseppe

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose of our study was to evaluate the behavior of the lumbar spine of young athletes in the supine and standing position, taking into account all postural changes that the spine undergoes during physiological load, any alterations and any discrepancies in the detection of pathology between the two positions.Between August 2008 and October 2009, we evaluated 40 sportsman (20 men and 20 women) with symptoms of lumbar pain.All subjects underwent MRI with a dedicated scanner of 0.25 Tesla (G-Scan, Esaote Biomedica, Genoa, Italy) either in the conventional supine position, either in the weight-bearing position. Spin echo T1w and fast spin echo T2w images were acquired with a dedicated receiving coil for the lumbar spine (group B). Three radiologists, blinded on history and clinical examination of subjects, assessed, in consensus, variations of lumbar lordosis angle, of lumbo-sacral angle and presence of pathology on images acquired in both positions, in different sequences and in different planes.Conventional supine MRI was positive for pathology 30/40 while weight-bearing MRI was positive in 39/40 respectively.In particular, the evaluation in the weight-bearing position allowed, in 9 cases to detect diseases that would have remained unrecognized if the evaluation had been performed only in the supine position. Compared to MRI in the supine position, weight-bearing MRI showed changes of the lumbo-sacral angle in 31/40 subjects and of lumbar lordosis angle in all 40 subjects. Imaging the lumbar spine in weight-bearing position with a dedicated MRI scanner and a dedicated coil might allow identification of pathology that may be overlooked if imaging patients only in the supine position.

AB - Purpose of our study was to evaluate the behavior of the lumbar spine of young athletes in the supine and standing position, taking into account all postural changes that the spine undergoes during physiological load, any alterations and any discrepancies in the detection of pathology between the two positions.Between August 2008 and October 2009, we evaluated 40 sportsman (20 men and 20 women) with symptoms of lumbar pain.All subjects underwent MRI with a dedicated scanner of 0.25 Tesla (G-Scan, Esaote Biomedica, Genoa, Italy) either in the conventional supine position, either in the weight-bearing position. Spin echo T1w and fast spin echo T2w images were acquired with a dedicated receiving coil for the lumbar spine (group B). Three radiologists, blinded on history and clinical examination of subjects, assessed, in consensus, variations of lumbar lordosis angle, of lumbo-sacral angle and presence of pathology on images acquired in both positions, in different sequences and in different planes.Conventional supine MRI was positive for pathology 30/40 while weight-bearing MRI was positive in 39/40 respectively.In particular, the evaluation in the weight-bearing position allowed, in 9 cases to detect diseases that would have remained unrecognized if the evaluation had been performed only in the supine position. Compared to MRI in the supine position, weight-bearing MRI showed changes of the lumbo-sacral angle in 31/40 subjects and of lumbar lordosis angle in all 40 subjects. Imaging the lumbar spine in weight-bearing position with a dedicated MRI scanner and a dedicated coil might allow identification of pathology that may be overlooked if imaging patients only in the supine position.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/83730

UR - http://www.minervamedica.it/it/riviste/medicina-dello-sport/articolo.php?cod=R26Y2013N02A0241

M3 - Article

VL - 66(2)

SP - 241

EP - 252

JO - MEDICINA DELLO SPORT

JF - MEDICINA DELLO SPORT

SN - 0025-7826

ER -