Moral Harm and Moral Responsibility: A Defence of Ascriptivism

Risultato della ricerca: Articlepeer review

2 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the relations between the concepts of moral harm and moral responsibility, arguing for a circularity between the two. On this basis the conceptual soundness of descriptivism, on which consequentialist and non-consequentialist arguments are often grounded, is questioned. In the last section a certain version of ascriptivism is defended: the circularity is relevant in order to understand how a restricted version of ascriptivism may in fact be well founded.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)149-179
Numero di pagine31
RivistaRatio Juris
Volume25
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Moral Harm and Moral Responsibility: A Defence of Ascriptivism'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo