TY - JOUR
T1 - MMP-2,MMP-9 and Activin A blood levels in patients with breast cancer or prostate cancer metastatic to the bone.
AU - Rini, Giovam Battista
AU - Leto, Gaetano
AU - Arcara, Carlo
AU - Sferrazza, Carmela
AU - Fricano, Salvatore
AU - Incorvaia, Lorena
AU - Di Trapani, Danilo
AU - Badalamenti, Giuseppe
AU - Gebbia, Nicola
AU - Rini, Giovambattista
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Background: The clinical significance of the
circulating levels of activin A and matrix metalloproteinase-2
(MMP-2) and -9 (MMP-9) was investigated in patients with
breast cancer (BC) or prostate cancer (PC) with (M1) or
without (M0) bone metastasis. Patients and Methods: MMP-2,
MMP-9 and activin A blood concentrations were measured by
enzyme immunoassays in 79 cancer patients and in 57 healthy
blood donors (HS) who served as a control group. The
diagnostic accuracy of these molecules to discriminate between
M0 and M1 patients was evaluated by the receiver operating
characteristic curve (ROC) and compared to that of tumor
markers CA15.3 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Results:
Activin A and MMP-2 were significantly increased in BC and
PC patients as compared to sex-matched HS while MMP-9
levels were more elevated only in the PC patients. Interestingly,
in the PC patients, activin A levels were significantly higher than
those measured in the BC patients. In this latter group, activin A
and CA15.3 but not MMP-2 or MMP-9 were increased in the
M1 patients as compared to M0 patients. Furthermore, a
significant relationship was also highlighted between activin A
concentration and the number of bone metastases and tumor
grade, between MMP-9 and tumor grade, and between MMP-2
and CA15.3. ROC curve analysis showed a good diagnostic
accuracy for activin A and CA15.3 but a poor accuracy for
MMP-2 and MMP-9 in discriminating between M0 and M1
patients. However, CA15.3 retained the best diagnostic accuracy
in this respect. In the PC group, only activin A and PSA levels
were significantly increased in the M1 patients as compared to
the M0 patients. A similar although not statistically significant
trend was noted for MMP-9. Interestingly, a significant correlation
was observed between PSA and activin A and MMP-9, and
between Activin A and Gleason score and the number of
skeletal metastases. ROC curve analysis showed a good
diagnostic accuracy for activin A, MMP-9 and PSA and a poor
diagnostic accuracy for MMP-2 in detecting M1 patients.
However, PSA showed the highest diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusion: Activin A, MMP-2 and MMP-9 may be regarded as
possible therapeutic targets in the treatment of metastatic bone
disease. However, their usefulness as additional markers of bone
metastasis remains to be better defined
AB - Background: The clinical significance of the
circulating levels of activin A and matrix metalloproteinase-2
(MMP-2) and -9 (MMP-9) was investigated in patients with
breast cancer (BC) or prostate cancer (PC) with (M1) or
without (M0) bone metastasis. Patients and Methods: MMP-2,
MMP-9 and activin A blood concentrations were measured by
enzyme immunoassays in 79 cancer patients and in 57 healthy
blood donors (HS) who served as a control group. The
diagnostic accuracy of these molecules to discriminate between
M0 and M1 patients was evaluated by the receiver operating
characteristic curve (ROC) and compared to that of tumor
markers CA15.3 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Results:
Activin A and MMP-2 were significantly increased in BC and
PC patients as compared to sex-matched HS while MMP-9
levels were more elevated only in the PC patients. Interestingly,
in the PC patients, activin A levels were significantly higher than
those measured in the BC patients. In this latter group, activin A
and CA15.3 but not MMP-2 or MMP-9 were increased in the
M1 patients as compared to M0 patients. Furthermore, a
significant relationship was also highlighted between activin A
concentration and the number of bone metastases and tumor
grade, between MMP-9 and tumor grade, and between MMP-2
and CA15.3. ROC curve analysis showed a good diagnostic
accuracy for activin A and CA15.3 but a poor accuracy for
MMP-2 and MMP-9 in discriminating between M0 and M1
patients. However, CA15.3 retained the best diagnostic accuracy
in this respect. In the PC group, only activin A and PSA levels
were significantly increased in the M1 patients as compared to
the M0 patients. A similar although not statistically significant
trend was noted for MMP-9. Interestingly, a significant correlation
was observed between PSA and activin A and MMP-9, and
between Activin A and Gleason score and the number of
skeletal metastases. ROC curve analysis showed a good
diagnostic accuracy for activin A, MMP-9 and PSA and a poor
diagnostic accuracy for MMP-2 in detecting M1 patients.
However, PSA showed the highest diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusion: Activin A, MMP-2 and MMP-9 may be regarded as
possible therapeutic targets in the treatment of metastatic bone
disease. However, their usefulness as additional markers of bone
metastasis remains to be better defined
KW - Activin, Breast Cancder, Bone metastasis, proteinases
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/62925
M3 - Article
SN - 0250-7005
VL - 27
SP - 1519
EP - 1526
JO - Anticancer Research
JF - Anticancer Research
ER -