TY - CONF
T1 - Maximizing water use efficiency in designing microirrigation unit (IrriLab Software)
AU - Baiamonte, Giorgio
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - As the year 2050 approaches, the world population will reach 9 billion - so does the challenge of doubling cropyields. To meet this crop yields demand, the associated dramatic improving of water productivity (WP) must necessarilybe accompanied by maximization of water use efficiency (WUE) (Ragab 2011, UNEP 2014). In this work,a recently developed software (IrriLab, https://www.facebook.com/irrilab) moving in this direction is presented.IrriLab is a very simple toll allows to design microirrigation unit optimizing WUE, pressure energy and irrigationunit costs.Irrigation software available in commerce provide microirrigation system designs, by mainly looking at the maximumflow rate uniformity criteria. Thus, each emitter installed along the laterals operates with an operating pressurehead occurring in between an established range of pressure head variability (Dh < Dhadm). However, thelatter condition does not always corresponds to the cheapest and to the maximizing WUE solution; in fact, it is notassured if the entire range of the admitted pressure head is profited and used by the emitters. IrriLab allows thisoccurrence because, for the entire Irrigation Unit Area, IUA, each design solution assures that at least two emittersrigorously operates, one with the minimum admitted pressure head, and the other one with the maximum admitted(Dh = Dhadm), (Baiamonte et al., 2015; Baiamonte, 2016). The same extreme values of pressure head are thosethat in the common design criteria delimit the range of pressure head, but without assuring their achievement.Compared to the common design criteria, this condition i) for fixed laterals’ length and inside diameter, allowsreducing the inlet required pressure head whereas, ii) for fixed pressure head at the inlet, provides an increasing inlaterals and manifold lengths and in the associated IUA.Based on analytical solutions, IrriLab follows a very simple rectangular sketch, any way oriented in the space, anddefined by two slope values, one for the laterals and one for the manifold. By considering the possible combinationsof i) horizontal, downward or upward sloped laterals and manifold, ii) the manifold position in respect to the lateralsand iii) the inlet position in respect to the manifold, which can be equal to 0%, 24% or 50%, in respect to theirlengths (Baiamonte, 2016), IrriLab accounts for 25 optimal irrigation unit layouts, for each of them providingmaximum WUE.
AB - As the year 2050 approaches, the world population will reach 9 billion - so does the challenge of doubling cropyields. To meet this crop yields demand, the associated dramatic improving of water productivity (WP) must necessarilybe accompanied by maximization of water use efficiency (WUE) (Ragab 2011, UNEP 2014). In this work,a recently developed software (IrriLab, https://www.facebook.com/irrilab) moving in this direction is presented.IrriLab is a very simple toll allows to design microirrigation unit optimizing WUE, pressure energy and irrigationunit costs.Irrigation software available in commerce provide microirrigation system designs, by mainly looking at the maximumflow rate uniformity criteria. Thus, each emitter installed along the laterals operates with an operating pressurehead occurring in between an established range of pressure head variability (Dh < Dhadm). However, thelatter condition does not always corresponds to the cheapest and to the maximizing WUE solution; in fact, it is notassured if the entire range of the admitted pressure head is profited and used by the emitters. IrriLab allows thisoccurrence because, for the entire Irrigation Unit Area, IUA, each design solution assures that at least two emittersrigorously operates, one with the minimum admitted pressure head, and the other one with the maximum admitted(Dh = Dhadm), (Baiamonte et al., 2015; Baiamonte, 2016). The same extreme values of pressure head are thosethat in the common design criteria delimit the range of pressure head, but without assuring their achievement.Compared to the common design criteria, this condition i) for fixed laterals’ length and inside diameter, allowsreducing the inlet required pressure head whereas, ii) for fixed pressure head at the inlet, provides an increasing inlaterals and manifold lengths and in the associated IUA.Based on analytical solutions, IrriLab follows a very simple rectangular sketch, any way oriented in the space, anddefined by two slope values, one for the laterals and one for the manifold. By considering the possible combinationsof i) horizontal, downward or upward sloped laterals and manifold, ii) the manifold position in respect to the lateralsand iii) the inlet position in respect to the manifold, which can be equal to 0%, 24% or 50%, in respect to theirlengths (Baiamonte, 2016), IrriLab accounts for 25 optimal irrigation unit layouts, for each of them providingmaximum WUE.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/235348
M3 - Other
ER -