L'uso della comparazione giuridica e i diritti fondamentali nella sentenza della Corte costituzionale sudafricana Case CCT 23/96 "Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996"

De Grazia Luciana

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

The effort of the paper is to examine how the South African Constitutional Court, in the CCT 23/96 Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, has considered foreign law and if it has conducted a study of comparison, with a particular attention on the subject of fundamental rights. The study analyses the degree of comparison, its formative nature and finally it establishes which rule of foreign law has been considered (legislative, dottrinal or case-law). Therefore the research verifies whether there is a preference on a particular giuridical system and why.
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)507-546
Numero di pagine40
RivistaARCHIVIO GIURIDICO
VolumeCCXXVIII
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2008

Cita questo

L'uso della comparazione giuridica e i diritti fondamentali nella sentenza della Corte costituzionale sudafricana Case CCT 23/96 "Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996". / De Grazia Luciana.

In: ARCHIVIO GIURIDICO, Vol. CCXXVIII, 2008, pag. 507-546.

Risultato della ricerca: Article

De Grazia Luciana 2008, 'L'uso della comparazione giuridica e i diritti fondamentali nella sentenza della Corte costituzionale sudafricana Case CCT 23/96 "Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996"', ARCHIVIO GIURIDICO, vol. CCXXVIII, pagg. 507-546.
De Grazia Luciana. L'uso della comparazione giuridica e i diritti fondamentali nella sentenza della Corte costituzionale sudafricana Case CCT 23/96 "Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996". ARCHIVIO GIURIDICO. 2008;CCXXVIII:507-546.
De Grazia Luciana. / L'uso della comparazione giuridica e i diritti fondamentali nella sentenza della Corte costituzionale sudafricana Case CCT 23/96 "Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996". In: ARCHIVIO GIURIDICO. 2008 ; Vol. CCXXVIII. pagg. 507-546.
@article{a6edeb7bcbd14e5daa47d14d1a86bb21,
title = "L'uso della comparazione giuridica e i diritti fondamentali nella sentenza della Corte costituzionale sudafricana Case CCT 23/96 {"}Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996{"}",
abstract = "The effort of the paper is to examine how the South African Constitutional Court, in the CCT 23/96 Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, has considered foreign law and if it has conducted a study of comparison, with a particular attention on the subject of fundamental rights. The study analyses the degree of comparison, its formative nature and finally it establishes which rule of foreign law has been considered (legislative, dottrinal or case-law). Therefore the research verifies whether there is a preference on a particular giuridical system and why.",
author = "{De Grazia Luciana} and {De Grazia}, Luciana",
year = "2008",
language = "Italian",
volume = "CCXXVIII",
pages = "507--546",
journal = "ARCHIVIO GIURIDICO",
issn = "1122-6706",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - L'uso della comparazione giuridica e i diritti fondamentali nella sentenza della Corte costituzionale sudafricana Case CCT 23/96 "Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996"

AU - De Grazia Luciana

AU - De Grazia, Luciana

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The effort of the paper is to examine how the South African Constitutional Court, in the CCT 23/96 Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, has considered foreign law and if it has conducted a study of comparison, with a particular attention on the subject of fundamental rights. The study analyses the degree of comparison, its formative nature and finally it establishes which rule of foreign law has been considered (legislative, dottrinal or case-law). Therefore the research verifies whether there is a preference on a particular giuridical system and why.

AB - The effort of the paper is to examine how the South African Constitutional Court, in the CCT 23/96 Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, has considered foreign law and if it has conducted a study of comparison, with a particular attention on the subject of fundamental rights. The study analyses the degree of comparison, its formative nature and finally it establishes which rule of foreign law has been considered (legislative, dottrinal or case-law). Therefore the research verifies whether there is a preference on a particular giuridical system and why.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/238149

M3 - Article

VL - CCXXVIII

SP - 507

EP - 546

JO - ARCHIVIO GIURIDICO

JF - ARCHIVIO GIURIDICO

SN - 1122-6706

ER -

Accesso al documento