LA PRESENTAZIONE DEI SITI GALLO-ROMANI. Conservare, Proteggere e Musealizzare

Risultato della ricerca: Book

Abstract

Today’s interventionist experience is deeply oriented towards an all cost valorization of archaeological heritage, which is sometimes perpetuated disregarding the real possibilities of execution, or without a sensible sustainability of the interventions. One cannot keep thinking to have to offer the public everything straight away, because, if the necessary resources or the community interest happens to lack, there is the risk of leaving the “resurfaced” ruins in the open air, thus having them suffer probable looting or relentless degrading factors. The risk is also not to take on all due account the different types of intervention required by every single archaeological reality, thereby flattening all the possible types of ruin treatments to uniformity, whereas they hold, even in their diversity, their own unique nature. If we take the Roman archaeology as an example, with all its national differentiations, each musealization intervention on it has been rendered in different ways, depending on the different archaeological realities upon which the intervention has taken effect, finding then specific variations according to the nation of reference. The text reports the results of an extensive scientific research dealing with the issue of the in situ archaeological communication, from a museological point of view, notably analyzing the museographic strategies in the French territory and pointing out in itinere a set of exemplary cases of mise en valeur of ancient contexts; trying at the same time to present a range of intervention methods to the professionals operating in the area of archaeological development and musealization.
Lingua originaleItalian
EditoreOffset Studio
Numero di pagine158
ISBN (stampa)978-88-89683-44-6
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2012

Serie di pubblicazioni

Nome3

Cita questo

@book{e0acd6363dee40c988edf8c3bd3e7cda,
title = "LA PRESENTAZIONE DEI SITI GALLO-ROMANI. Conservare, Proteggere e Musealizzare",
abstract = "Today’s interventionist experience is deeply oriented towards an all cost valorization of archaeological heritage, which is sometimes perpetuated disregarding the real possibilities of execution, or without a sensible sustainability of the interventions. One cannot keep thinking to have to offer the public everything straight away, because, if the necessary resources or the community interest happens to lack, there is the risk of leaving the “resurfaced” ruins in the open air, thus having them suffer probable looting or relentless degrading factors. The risk is also not to take on all due account the different types of intervention required by every single archaeological reality, thereby flattening all the possible types of ruin treatments to uniformity, whereas they hold, even in their diversity, their own unique nature. If we take the Roman archaeology as an example, with all its national differentiations, each musealization intervention on it has been rendered in different ways, depending on the different archaeological realities upon which the intervention has taken effect, finding then specific variations according to the nation of reference. The text reports the results of an extensive scientific research dealing with the issue of the in situ archaeological communication, from a museological point of view, notably analyzing the museographic strategies in the French territory and pointing out in itinere a set of exemplary cases of mise en valeur of ancient contexts; trying at the same time to present a range of intervention methods to the professionals operating in the area of archaeological development and musealization.",
keywords = "musealizzazione, comunicazione, siti archeologici, musei del sito, riuso, conservazione",
author = "Accardi, {Aldo Renato Daniele}",
year = "2012",
language = "Italian",
isbn = "978-88-89683-44-6",
series = "3",
publisher = "Offset Studio",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - LA PRESENTAZIONE DEI SITI GALLO-ROMANI. Conservare, Proteggere e Musealizzare

AU - Accardi, Aldo Renato Daniele

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Today’s interventionist experience is deeply oriented towards an all cost valorization of archaeological heritage, which is sometimes perpetuated disregarding the real possibilities of execution, or without a sensible sustainability of the interventions. One cannot keep thinking to have to offer the public everything straight away, because, if the necessary resources or the community interest happens to lack, there is the risk of leaving the “resurfaced” ruins in the open air, thus having them suffer probable looting or relentless degrading factors. The risk is also not to take on all due account the different types of intervention required by every single archaeological reality, thereby flattening all the possible types of ruin treatments to uniformity, whereas they hold, even in their diversity, their own unique nature. If we take the Roman archaeology as an example, with all its national differentiations, each musealization intervention on it has been rendered in different ways, depending on the different archaeological realities upon which the intervention has taken effect, finding then specific variations according to the nation of reference. The text reports the results of an extensive scientific research dealing with the issue of the in situ archaeological communication, from a museological point of view, notably analyzing the museographic strategies in the French territory and pointing out in itinere a set of exemplary cases of mise en valeur of ancient contexts; trying at the same time to present a range of intervention methods to the professionals operating in the area of archaeological development and musealization.

AB - Today’s interventionist experience is deeply oriented towards an all cost valorization of archaeological heritage, which is sometimes perpetuated disregarding the real possibilities of execution, or without a sensible sustainability of the interventions. One cannot keep thinking to have to offer the public everything straight away, because, if the necessary resources or the community interest happens to lack, there is the risk of leaving the “resurfaced” ruins in the open air, thus having them suffer probable looting or relentless degrading factors. The risk is also not to take on all due account the different types of intervention required by every single archaeological reality, thereby flattening all the possible types of ruin treatments to uniformity, whereas they hold, even in their diversity, their own unique nature. If we take the Roman archaeology as an example, with all its national differentiations, each musealization intervention on it has been rendered in different ways, depending on the different archaeological realities upon which the intervention has taken effect, finding then specific variations according to the nation of reference. The text reports the results of an extensive scientific research dealing with the issue of the in situ archaeological communication, from a museological point of view, notably analyzing the museographic strategies in the French territory and pointing out in itinere a set of exemplary cases of mise en valeur of ancient contexts; trying at the same time to present a range of intervention methods to the professionals operating in the area of archaeological development and musealization.

KW - musealizzazione, comunicazione, siti archeologici, musei del sito, riuso, conservazione

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/66197

M3 - Book

SN - 978-88-89683-44-6

T3 - 3

BT - LA PRESENTAZIONE DEI SITI GALLO-ROMANI. Conservare, Proteggere e Musealizzare

PB - Offset Studio

ER -