Is the Middle-East an Optimum Currency Area? A Comparison of Costs and Benefits

Davide Furceri, Davide Furceri, Georgios Karras

Risultato della ricerca: Articlepeer review

4 Citazioni (Scopus)


This paper examines the macroeconomic costs and benefits of adopting a common currency for 13 Middle Eastern countries. Economic theory suggests that the main benefit is enhanced price stability, while the main cost is higher business-cycle volatility if the member country’s output is not sufficiently correlated with the area’s, as a whole. Using data from 1980–2005, the paper finds that the estimated cost and benefit measures exhibit substantial variability across the countries and are sometimes positively correlated. Moreover, focusing on the results for the last decade, it seems that many Middle Eastern countries (such as Bahrain, Kuwait, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria and United Arab Emirates) have achieved remarkable convergence both in business-cycle synchronization and inflation outcomes.
Lingua originaleEnglish
Numero di pagine13
RivistaOpen Economies Review
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • ???subjectarea.asjc.2000.2002???


Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Is the Middle-East an Optimum Currency Area? A Comparison of Costs and Benefits'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo