Is Embodiment All That We Need?Insights from the Acquisition of Negation

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

Simulation of propositional content does not sufficiently explain real-life linguistic activity, even for action-related language. In addition, how we get from propositional content to implicit and inferential meaning needs to be explained. Indeed, simulative understanding is immediate, automatic and reflex-like while an explicit interpretative act, even if not always needed, is still a part of many linguistic activities. The aim of this paper is to present the hypothesis that speaking is a complex ability realized by means of at least two different mechanisms that are likely developed at different and consecutive steps of cognitive and linguistic development. The first mechanism has a neural explanation grounded in the notion of embodied simulation. The second implies socio-cognitive skills such as Theory of Mind. In order to fully develop the second mechanism, a symbolic communication and interaction with a cultural community are needed. This hypothesis will be tested by looking at the acquisition of linguistic negation.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)259-275
Numero di pagine17
RivistaBIOLINGUISTICS
Volume6
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

linguistics
simulation
speaking
communication
ability
interaction
language
community

Cita questo

Is Embodiment All That We Need?Insights from the Acquisition of Negation. / Cuccio, Valentina.

In: BIOLINGUISTICS, Vol. 6, 2012, pag. 259-275.

Risultato della ricerca: Article

@article{368e697eb873442787446137d90e8691,
title = "Is Embodiment All That We Need?Insights from the Acquisition of Negation",
abstract = "Simulation of propositional content does not sufficiently explain real-life linguistic activity, even for action-related language. In addition, how we get from propositional content to implicit and inferential meaning needs to be explained. Indeed, simulative understanding is immediate, automatic and reflex-like while an explicit interpretative act, even if not always needed, is still a part of many linguistic activities. The aim of this paper is to present the hypothesis that speaking is a complex ability realized by means of at least two different mechanisms that are likely developed at different and consecutive steps of cognitive and linguistic development. The first mechanism has a neural explanation grounded in the notion of embodied simulation. The second implies socio-cognitive skills such as Theory of Mind. In order to fully develop the second mechanism, a symbolic communication and interaction with a cultural community are needed. This hypothesis will be tested by looking at the acquisition of linguistic negation.",
keywords = "Embodied language, inferential meaning, negation.",
author = "Valentina Cuccio",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "259--275",
journal = "BIOLINGUISTICS",
issn = "1450-3417",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Embodiment All That We Need?Insights from the Acquisition of Negation

AU - Cuccio, Valentina

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Simulation of propositional content does not sufficiently explain real-life linguistic activity, even for action-related language. In addition, how we get from propositional content to implicit and inferential meaning needs to be explained. Indeed, simulative understanding is immediate, automatic and reflex-like while an explicit interpretative act, even if not always needed, is still a part of many linguistic activities. The aim of this paper is to present the hypothesis that speaking is a complex ability realized by means of at least two different mechanisms that are likely developed at different and consecutive steps of cognitive and linguistic development. The first mechanism has a neural explanation grounded in the notion of embodied simulation. The second implies socio-cognitive skills such as Theory of Mind. In order to fully develop the second mechanism, a symbolic communication and interaction with a cultural community are needed. This hypothesis will be tested by looking at the acquisition of linguistic negation.

AB - Simulation of propositional content does not sufficiently explain real-life linguistic activity, even for action-related language. In addition, how we get from propositional content to implicit and inferential meaning needs to be explained. Indeed, simulative understanding is immediate, automatic and reflex-like while an explicit interpretative act, even if not always needed, is still a part of many linguistic activities. The aim of this paper is to present the hypothesis that speaking is a complex ability realized by means of at least two different mechanisms that are likely developed at different and consecutive steps of cognitive and linguistic development. The first mechanism has a neural explanation grounded in the notion of embodied simulation. The second implies socio-cognitive skills such as Theory of Mind. In order to fully develop the second mechanism, a symbolic communication and interaction with a cultural community are needed. This hypothesis will be tested by looking at the acquisition of linguistic negation.

KW - Embodied language

KW - inferential meaning

KW - negation.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/71645

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 259

EP - 275

JO - BIOLINGUISTICS

JF - BIOLINGUISTICS

SN - 1450-3417

ER -