Abstract
The article critically reviews Riccardo Guastini’s theory of legal interpretation, as it is now exposed in the recent book Interpretare e argomentare. While broadly sympathetic with Guastini’s jurisprudential project, the author tries to highlight some weaknesses in his conceptual framework – namely, regarding the distinction between “scientific” and “decisional” interpretation, the distinction between interpretation properly understood and creation of new law, and the concept of interpretive creativity
| Lingua originale | Italian |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 77-100 |
| Numero di pagine | 24 |
| Rivista | Rivista di Filosofia del Diritto |
| Volume | II |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Published - 2013 |