Innovation in the regeneration of the histric center in Sicily: Barcellona Pozzo di Gotto (ME)

Gangemi G

Risultato della ricerca: Paper

Abstract

Abstract The criteria for intervention on the existing building heritage in the historic centers cannot be pursued without taking into consideration the renovation of the whole relevant urban territory. This does not imply an idea to postpone to future planning, rather to increase the topics in the General Urban Plan (PUG), by bringing into the PUG the elements of the traditional detailed plans for the historic areas with a methodology simplification. The detailed planning has been characterized in the years as “exemplary”, possibly due to the complexity of its project contents and rules and regulations, particularly in the historic areas. Indeed in Italy detailed plans for historic areas are quite rarely introduced and even more rarely implemented. In recent years there has been more awareness of the problem and commitment to change through practical actions. The regional regulations dedicated to the regeneration of the historic centers are an example of this change, and aim at the renovation of the historic areas through a direct intervention (not subordinate to the detailed plan) included in the General Urban Plan of the local administration. The 2007 PUG of Barcellona Pozzo di Gotto in Sicily (Fig. 1), is based on a residential capacity of 47,000 people for the next twenty years, with an increase of around 5,000 people. These are distributed over 300 hectares of urbanized area, out of which 86 hectares are represented by historic area, with a residential capacity of 11,600 people and a density of 135 pp/Ha. Recently the local administration has decided to adapt the PUG to the regulations for the regeneration of the historic center. The urban set up of the historic area is characterized by the alignment of the buildings on the old central axis of entrance and exit of the city, incorporating some of the historic rural boroughs. The urban set up is organized as a chessboard, more or less regular, originally over more generating centers, that have today disappeared (the old Dome and the Theater, the first demolished in 1936 and the second one destroyed after a fire in 1972). The building blocks include non allocated spaces and empty areas, as residue of the primitive building set up that was incorporated in the new urban network from the beginning of 1900s. The building units of the historic areas have been touched, particularly in the facades, with interventions that have alternated their original image. Nevertheless, the historic area preserves all its residential and commercial functions, even in the relationship with the new expansion areas and the productive areas. The boundaries of the historic area have been defined by taking into consideration the urban history, the building heritage and its transformations, the functional aspects (accessibility, mobility, availability of services) so as to utilize again the historic building heritage itself. The regeneration interventions have been classified in simplified categories, divided into ordinary and extra-ordinary maintenance, restoration, preservative restoration, regeneration, extensive regeneration, demolition and reconstruction, renovation with the same building typology/philology, demolition without reconstruction. The individual categories are accompanied by other technical detailed regulations to be applied “house-by-house” in the entire historic area.
Lingua originaleEnglish
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

innovation
regeneration
demolition
urban history
historic building
preservative
typology
accessibility
dome
methodology
plan
historic centre
restoration
planning
regulation

Cita questo

@conference{78553b64c8a443a5a5c0170dead84f6f,
title = "Innovation in the regeneration of the histric center in Sicily: Barcellona Pozzo di Gotto (ME)",
abstract = "Abstract The criteria for intervention on the existing building heritage in the historic centers cannot be pursued without taking into consideration the renovation of the whole relevant urban territory. This does not imply an idea to postpone to future planning, rather to increase the topics in the General Urban Plan (PUG), by bringing into the PUG the elements of the traditional detailed plans for the historic areas with a methodology simplification. The detailed planning has been characterized in the years as “exemplary”, possibly due to the complexity of its project contents and rules and regulations, particularly in the historic areas. Indeed in Italy detailed plans for historic areas are quite rarely introduced and even more rarely implemented. In recent years there has been more awareness of the problem and commitment to change through practical actions. The regional regulations dedicated to the regeneration of the historic centers are an example of this change, and aim at the renovation of the historic areas through a direct intervention (not subordinate to the detailed plan) included in the General Urban Plan of the local administration. The 2007 PUG of Barcellona Pozzo di Gotto in Sicily (Fig. 1), is based on a residential capacity of 47,000 people for the next twenty years, with an increase of around 5,000 people. These are distributed over 300 hectares of urbanized area, out of which 86 hectares are represented by historic area, with a residential capacity of 11,600 people and a density of 135 pp/Ha. Recently the local administration has decided to adapt the PUG to the regulations for the regeneration of the historic center. The urban set up of the historic area is characterized by the alignment of the buildings on the old central axis of entrance and exit of the city, incorporating some of the historic rural boroughs. The urban set up is organized as a chessboard, more or less regular, originally over more generating centers, that have today disappeared (the old Dome and the Theater, the first demolished in 1936 and the second one destroyed after a fire in 1972). The building blocks include non allocated spaces and empty areas, as residue of the primitive building set up that was incorporated in the new urban network from the beginning of 1900s. The building units of the historic areas have been touched, particularly in the facades, with interventions that have alternated their original image. Nevertheless, the historic area preserves all its residential and commercial functions, even in the relationship with the new expansion areas and the productive areas. The boundaries of the historic area have been defined by taking into consideration the urban history, the building heritage and its transformations, the functional aspects (accessibility, mobility, availability of services) so as to utilize again the historic building heritage itself. The regeneration interventions have been classified in simplified categories, divided into ordinary and extra-ordinary maintenance, restoration, preservative restoration, regeneration, extensive regeneration, demolition and reconstruction, renovation with the same building typology/philology, demolition without reconstruction. The individual categories are accompanied by other technical detailed regulations to be applied “house-by-house” in the entire historic area.",
keywords = "innovation, regeneration, historic center, simplification",
author = "{Gangemi G} and Giuseppe Gangemi",
year = "2012",
language = "English",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Innovation in the regeneration of the histric center in Sicily: Barcellona Pozzo di Gotto (ME)

AU - Gangemi G

AU - Gangemi, Giuseppe

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Abstract The criteria for intervention on the existing building heritage in the historic centers cannot be pursued without taking into consideration the renovation of the whole relevant urban territory. This does not imply an idea to postpone to future planning, rather to increase the topics in the General Urban Plan (PUG), by bringing into the PUG the elements of the traditional detailed plans for the historic areas with a methodology simplification. The detailed planning has been characterized in the years as “exemplary”, possibly due to the complexity of its project contents and rules and regulations, particularly in the historic areas. Indeed in Italy detailed plans for historic areas are quite rarely introduced and even more rarely implemented. In recent years there has been more awareness of the problem and commitment to change through practical actions. The regional regulations dedicated to the regeneration of the historic centers are an example of this change, and aim at the renovation of the historic areas through a direct intervention (not subordinate to the detailed plan) included in the General Urban Plan of the local administration. The 2007 PUG of Barcellona Pozzo di Gotto in Sicily (Fig. 1), is based on a residential capacity of 47,000 people for the next twenty years, with an increase of around 5,000 people. These are distributed over 300 hectares of urbanized area, out of which 86 hectares are represented by historic area, with a residential capacity of 11,600 people and a density of 135 pp/Ha. Recently the local administration has decided to adapt the PUG to the regulations for the regeneration of the historic center. The urban set up of the historic area is characterized by the alignment of the buildings on the old central axis of entrance and exit of the city, incorporating some of the historic rural boroughs. The urban set up is organized as a chessboard, more or less regular, originally over more generating centers, that have today disappeared (the old Dome and the Theater, the first demolished in 1936 and the second one destroyed after a fire in 1972). The building blocks include non allocated spaces and empty areas, as residue of the primitive building set up that was incorporated in the new urban network from the beginning of 1900s. The building units of the historic areas have been touched, particularly in the facades, with interventions that have alternated their original image. Nevertheless, the historic area preserves all its residential and commercial functions, even in the relationship with the new expansion areas and the productive areas. The boundaries of the historic area have been defined by taking into consideration the urban history, the building heritage and its transformations, the functional aspects (accessibility, mobility, availability of services) so as to utilize again the historic building heritage itself. The regeneration interventions have been classified in simplified categories, divided into ordinary and extra-ordinary maintenance, restoration, preservative restoration, regeneration, extensive regeneration, demolition and reconstruction, renovation with the same building typology/philology, demolition without reconstruction. The individual categories are accompanied by other technical detailed regulations to be applied “house-by-house” in the entire historic area.

AB - Abstract The criteria for intervention on the existing building heritage in the historic centers cannot be pursued without taking into consideration the renovation of the whole relevant urban territory. This does not imply an idea to postpone to future planning, rather to increase the topics in the General Urban Plan (PUG), by bringing into the PUG the elements of the traditional detailed plans for the historic areas with a methodology simplification. The detailed planning has been characterized in the years as “exemplary”, possibly due to the complexity of its project contents and rules and regulations, particularly in the historic areas. Indeed in Italy detailed plans for historic areas are quite rarely introduced and even more rarely implemented. In recent years there has been more awareness of the problem and commitment to change through practical actions. The regional regulations dedicated to the regeneration of the historic centers are an example of this change, and aim at the renovation of the historic areas through a direct intervention (not subordinate to the detailed plan) included in the General Urban Plan of the local administration. The 2007 PUG of Barcellona Pozzo di Gotto in Sicily (Fig. 1), is based on a residential capacity of 47,000 people for the next twenty years, with an increase of around 5,000 people. These are distributed over 300 hectares of urbanized area, out of which 86 hectares are represented by historic area, with a residential capacity of 11,600 people and a density of 135 pp/Ha. Recently the local administration has decided to adapt the PUG to the regulations for the regeneration of the historic center. The urban set up of the historic area is characterized by the alignment of the buildings on the old central axis of entrance and exit of the city, incorporating some of the historic rural boroughs. The urban set up is organized as a chessboard, more or less regular, originally over more generating centers, that have today disappeared (the old Dome and the Theater, the first demolished in 1936 and the second one destroyed after a fire in 1972). The building blocks include non allocated spaces and empty areas, as residue of the primitive building set up that was incorporated in the new urban network from the beginning of 1900s. The building units of the historic areas have been touched, particularly in the facades, with interventions that have alternated their original image. Nevertheless, the historic area preserves all its residential and commercial functions, even in the relationship with the new expansion areas and the productive areas. The boundaries of the historic area have been defined by taking into consideration the urban history, the building heritage and its transformations, the functional aspects (accessibility, mobility, availability of services) so as to utilize again the historic building heritage itself. The regeneration interventions have been classified in simplified categories, divided into ordinary and extra-ordinary maintenance, restoration, preservative restoration, regeneration, extensive regeneration, demolition and reconstruction, renovation with the same building typology/philology, demolition without reconstruction. The individual categories are accompanied by other technical detailed regulations to be applied “house-by-house” in the entire historic area.

KW - innovation, regeneration, historic center, simplification

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/63235

M3 - Paper

ER -