Initial approaches in benchmarking and round robin testing for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers

Fabrizio Ganci, Danilovic, Fallisch, Gago, Ayers, Lettenmeier, Fabrizio Ganci, Mueller, Pivovar, Mergel, Carmo, Bender, Friedrich, Smolinka, Stolten

Risultato della ricerca: Article

4 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

As ever-increasing amounts of renewable electricity enter the energy supply mix on a regional, national and international basis, greater emphasis is being placed on energy conversion and storage technologies to deal with the oscillations, excess and lack of electricity. Hydrogen generation via proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) is one technology that offers a pathway to store large amounts of electricity in the form of hydrogen. The challenges to widespread adoption of PEM water electrolyzers lie in their high capital and operating costs which both need to be reduced through R&D. An evaluation of reported PEMWE performance data in the literature reveals that there are excessive variations of in situ performance results that make it difficult to draw conclusions on the pathway forward to performance optimization and future R&D directions. To enable the meaningful comparison of in situ performance evaluation across laboratories there is an obvious need for standardization of materials and testing protocols. Herein, we address this need by reporting the results of a round robin test effort conducted at the laboratories of five contributors to the IEA Electrolysis Annex 30. For this effort a method and equipment framework were first developed and then verified with respect to its feasibility for measuring water electrolysis performance accurately across the various laboratories. The effort utilized identical sets of test articles, materials, and test cells, and employed a set of shared test protocols. It further defined a minimum skeleton of requirements for the test station equipment. The maximum observed deviation between laboratories at 1 A cm −2 at cell temperatures of 60 °C and 80 °C was 27 and 20 mV, respectively. The deviation of the results from laboratory to laboratory was 2–3 times higher than the lowest deviation observed at one single lab and test station. However, the highest deviations observed were one-tenth of those extracted by a literature survey on similar material sets. The work endorses the urgent need to identify one or more reference sets of materials in addition to the method and equipment framework introduced here, to enable accurate comparison of results across the entire community. The results further imply that cell temperature control appears to be the most significant source of deviation between results, and that care must be taken with respect to break-in conditions and cell electrical connections for meaningful performance data.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)9174-9187
Numero di pagine14
RivistaInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume44
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Ion exchange
Protons
electrolysis
membranes
Membranes
Electrolysis
protons
deviation
Testing
electricity
water
Water
Electricity
cells
stations
operating costs
materials tests
Hydrogen
evaluation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Fuel Technology
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cita questo

Initial approaches in benchmarking and round robin testing for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. / Ganci, Fabrizio; Danilovic; Fallisch; Gago; Ayers; Lettenmeier; Ganci, Fabrizio; Mueller; Pivovar; Mergel; Carmo; Bender; Friedrich; Smolinka; Stolten.

In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 44, 2019, pag. 9174-9187.

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Ganci, F, Danilovic, Fallisch, Gago, Ayers, Lettenmeier, Ganci, F, Mueller, Pivovar, Mergel, Carmo, Bender, Friedrich, Smolinka & Stolten 2019, 'Initial approaches in benchmarking and round robin testing for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers', International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, pagg. 9174-9187.
Ganci, Fabrizio ; Danilovic ; Fallisch ; Gago ; Ayers ; Lettenmeier ; Ganci, Fabrizio ; Mueller ; Pivovar ; Mergel ; Carmo ; Bender ; Friedrich ; Smolinka ; Stolten. / Initial approaches in benchmarking and round robin testing for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019 ; Vol. 44. pagg. 9174-9187.
@article{9f26cd221c3243a7a28000c4c7779bc3,
title = "Initial approaches in benchmarking and round robin testing for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers",
abstract = "As ever-increasing amounts of renewable electricity enter the energy supply mix on a regional, national and international basis, greater emphasis is being placed on energy conversion and storage technologies to deal with the oscillations, excess and lack of electricity. Hydrogen generation via proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) is one technology that offers a pathway to store large amounts of electricity in the form of hydrogen. The challenges to widespread adoption of PEM water electrolyzers lie in their high capital and operating costs which both need to be reduced through R&D. An evaluation of reported PEMWE performance data in the literature reveals that there are excessive variations of in situ performance results that make it difficult to draw conclusions on the pathway forward to performance optimization and future R&D directions. To enable the meaningful comparison of in situ performance evaluation across laboratories there is an obvious need for standardization of materials and testing protocols. Herein, we address this need by reporting the results of a round robin test effort conducted at the laboratories of five contributors to the IEA Electrolysis Annex 30. For this effort a method and equipment framework were first developed and then verified with respect to its feasibility for measuring water electrolysis performance accurately across the various laboratories. The effort utilized identical sets of test articles, materials, and test cells, and employed a set of shared test protocols. It further defined a minimum skeleton of requirements for the test station equipment. The maximum observed deviation between laboratories at 1 A cm −2 at cell temperatures of 60 °C and 80 °C was 27 and 20 mV, respectively. The deviation of the results from laboratory to laboratory was 2–3 times higher than the lowest deviation observed at one single lab and test station. However, the highest deviations observed were one-tenth of those extracted by a literature survey on similar material sets. The work endorses the urgent need to identify one or more reference sets of materials in addition to the method and equipment framework introduced here, to enable accurate comparison of results across the entire community. The results further imply that cell temperature control appears to be the most significant source of deviation between results, and that care must be taken with respect to break-in conditions and cell electrical connections for meaningful performance data.",
author = "Fabrizio Ganci and Danilovic and Fallisch and Gago and Ayers and Lettenmeier and Fabrizio Ganci and Mueller and Pivovar and Mergel and Carmo and Bender and Friedrich and Smolinka and Stolten",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "9174--9187",
journal = "International Journal of Hydrogen Energy",
issn = "0360-3199",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Initial approaches in benchmarking and round robin testing for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers

AU - Ganci, Fabrizio

AU - Danilovic, null

AU - Fallisch, null

AU - Gago, null

AU - Ayers, null

AU - Lettenmeier, null

AU - Ganci, Fabrizio

AU - Mueller, null

AU - Pivovar, null

AU - Mergel, null

AU - Carmo, null

AU - Bender, null

AU - Friedrich, null

AU - Smolinka, null

AU - Stolten, null

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - As ever-increasing amounts of renewable electricity enter the energy supply mix on a regional, national and international basis, greater emphasis is being placed on energy conversion and storage technologies to deal with the oscillations, excess and lack of electricity. Hydrogen generation via proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) is one technology that offers a pathway to store large amounts of electricity in the form of hydrogen. The challenges to widespread adoption of PEM water electrolyzers lie in their high capital and operating costs which both need to be reduced through R&D. An evaluation of reported PEMWE performance data in the literature reveals that there are excessive variations of in situ performance results that make it difficult to draw conclusions on the pathway forward to performance optimization and future R&D directions. To enable the meaningful comparison of in situ performance evaluation across laboratories there is an obvious need for standardization of materials and testing protocols. Herein, we address this need by reporting the results of a round robin test effort conducted at the laboratories of five contributors to the IEA Electrolysis Annex 30. For this effort a method and equipment framework were first developed and then verified with respect to its feasibility for measuring water electrolysis performance accurately across the various laboratories. The effort utilized identical sets of test articles, materials, and test cells, and employed a set of shared test protocols. It further defined a minimum skeleton of requirements for the test station equipment. The maximum observed deviation between laboratories at 1 A cm −2 at cell temperatures of 60 °C and 80 °C was 27 and 20 mV, respectively. The deviation of the results from laboratory to laboratory was 2–3 times higher than the lowest deviation observed at one single lab and test station. However, the highest deviations observed were one-tenth of those extracted by a literature survey on similar material sets. The work endorses the urgent need to identify one or more reference sets of materials in addition to the method and equipment framework introduced here, to enable accurate comparison of results across the entire community. The results further imply that cell temperature control appears to be the most significant source of deviation between results, and that care must be taken with respect to break-in conditions and cell electrical connections for meaningful performance data.

AB - As ever-increasing amounts of renewable electricity enter the energy supply mix on a regional, national and international basis, greater emphasis is being placed on energy conversion and storage technologies to deal with the oscillations, excess and lack of electricity. Hydrogen generation via proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) is one technology that offers a pathway to store large amounts of electricity in the form of hydrogen. The challenges to widespread adoption of PEM water electrolyzers lie in their high capital and operating costs which both need to be reduced through R&D. An evaluation of reported PEMWE performance data in the literature reveals that there are excessive variations of in situ performance results that make it difficult to draw conclusions on the pathway forward to performance optimization and future R&D directions. To enable the meaningful comparison of in situ performance evaluation across laboratories there is an obvious need for standardization of materials and testing protocols. Herein, we address this need by reporting the results of a round robin test effort conducted at the laboratories of five contributors to the IEA Electrolysis Annex 30. For this effort a method and equipment framework were first developed and then verified with respect to its feasibility for measuring water electrolysis performance accurately across the various laboratories. The effort utilized identical sets of test articles, materials, and test cells, and employed a set of shared test protocols. It further defined a minimum skeleton of requirements for the test station equipment. The maximum observed deviation between laboratories at 1 A cm −2 at cell temperatures of 60 °C and 80 °C was 27 and 20 mV, respectively. The deviation of the results from laboratory to laboratory was 2–3 times higher than the lowest deviation observed at one single lab and test station. However, the highest deviations observed were one-tenth of those extracted by a literature survey on similar material sets. The work endorses the urgent need to identify one or more reference sets of materials in addition to the method and equipment framework introduced here, to enable accurate comparison of results across the entire community. The results further imply that cell temperature control appears to be the most significant source of deviation between results, and that care must be taken with respect to break-in conditions and cell electrical connections for meaningful performance data.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/351546

UR - http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-hydrogen-energy/

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 9174

EP - 9187

JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

SN - 0360-3199

ER -