IL NON LIQUET DELLA CORTE COSTITUZIONALE SULLA QUESTIONE DEL NE BIS IN IDEM SANZIONATORIO: UN MANCATO ESERCIZIO DEGLI STRUMENTI DELL’AGE OF BALANCING

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

The effective application of bis in idem principle is an issue that, in its own right, is part of different Courts’ dialogue, since it underlies a fundamental right, whose way of application can invade the scope of other fundamental rights, thus making a balancing operation inevitable. Such balancing is part of the competences of the Constitutional Courts and it is probably the reason why the Italian Supreme Court, despite being aware of the possible friction between rights with equal constitutional relevance, has asked the Constitutional Court if domestic double penalty system is compatible with the principle of ne bis in idem, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights. However, the Constitutional Court seems like has, in this case, renounced its role as an actor on the stage of the age of balancing. This paper analyzes the judgment of the Court and the possible consequences of a different judgment facing the problem of fundamental rights’ conflict.
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)89-121
Numero di pagine33
RivistaGIURISPRUDENZA DELLE IMPOSTE
VolumeXC
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2017

Cita questo

@article{fb95198e5e8d4b9492ef11e65dbb2f81,
title = "IL NON LIQUET DELLA CORTE COSTITUZIONALE SULLA QUESTIONE DEL NE BIS IN IDEM SANZIONATORIO: UN MANCATO ESERCIZIO DEGLI STRUMENTI DELL’AGE OF BALANCING",
abstract = "The effective application of bis in idem principle is an issue that, in its own right, is part of different Courts’ dialogue, since it underlies a fundamental right, whose way of application can invade the scope of other fundamental rights, thus making a balancing operation inevitable. Such balancing is part of the competences of the Constitutional Courts and it is probably the reason why the Italian Supreme Court, despite being aware of the possible friction between rights with equal constitutional relevance, has asked the Constitutional Court if domestic double penalty system is compatible with the principle of ne bis in idem, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights. However, the Constitutional Court seems like has, in this case, renounced its role as an actor on the stage of the age of balancing. This paper analyzes the judgment of the Court and the possible consequences of a different judgment facing the problem of fundamental rights’ conflict.",
keywords = "ne bis in idem, age of balancing",
author = "Antonio Perrone",
year = "2017",
language = "Italian",
volume = "XC",
pages = "89--121",
journal = "GIURISPRUDENZA DELLE IMPOSTE",
issn = "1826-2430",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - IL NON LIQUET DELLA CORTE COSTITUZIONALE SULLA QUESTIONE DEL NE BIS IN IDEM SANZIONATORIO: UN MANCATO ESERCIZIO DEGLI STRUMENTI DELL’AGE OF BALANCING

AU - Perrone, Antonio

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The effective application of bis in idem principle is an issue that, in its own right, is part of different Courts’ dialogue, since it underlies a fundamental right, whose way of application can invade the scope of other fundamental rights, thus making a balancing operation inevitable. Such balancing is part of the competences of the Constitutional Courts and it is probably the reason why the Italian Supreme Court, despite being aware of the possible friction between rights with equal constitutional relevance, has asked the Constitutional Court if domestic double penalty system is compatible with the principle of ne bis in idem, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights. However, the Constitutional Court seems like has, in this case, renounced its role as an actor on the stage of the age of balancing. This paper analyzes the judgment of the Court and the possible consequences of a different judgment facing the problem of fundamental rights’ conflict.

AB - The effective application of bis in idem principle is an issue that, in its own right, is part of different Courts’ dialogue, since it underlies a fundamental right, whose way of application can invade the scope of other fundamental rights, thus making a balancing operation inevitable. Such balancing is part of the competences of the Constitutional Courts and it is probably the reason why the Italian Supreme Court, despite being aware of the possible friction between rights with equal constitutional relevance, has asked the Constitutional Court if domestic double penalty system is compatible with the principle of ne bis in idem, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights. However, the Constitutional Court seems like has, in this case, renounced its role as an actor on the stage of the age of balancing. This paper analyzes the judgment of the Court and the possible consequences of a different judgment facing the problem of fundamental rights’ conflict.

KW - ne bis in idem, age of balancing

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/287807

M3 - Article

VL - XC

SP - 89

EP - 121

JO - GIURISPRUDENZA DELLE IMPOSTE

JF - GIURISPRUDENZA DELLE IMPOSTE

SN - 1826-2430

ER -