Abstract
The paper proposes a comparative analysis of Smith’s and Ricardo’s views on the sinking fund. It shows that Smith and Ricardo agreed in stressing the ineffectiveness of the sinking fund as a policy instrument targeted at public debt repayment and tax-burden relief, pointing out that its actual workings had paradoxically helped to increase rather than reduce British total debt-load. Moreover, their explanation of the sinking fund paradox integrates a defective fiscal commitment technology with powerful politicians’ incentives to siphon off the money stored in the sinking fund to meet sudden increases of public expenditure whenever the occasion arose.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 544-560 |
Numero di pagine | 17 |
Rivista | European Journal of the History of Economic Thought |
Volume | 23 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Published - 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- ???subjectarea.asjc.1200.1200???
- ???subjectarea.asjc.2000.2001???
- ???subjectarea.asjc.1200.1207???