Global sensitivity analysis for urban water quality modelling: comparison of different methods

Vanrolleghem, P; Neuman, M

Risultato della ricerca: Paper

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis represents an important step in improving the understanding and use of environmental models. Indeed, by means of global sensitivity analysis (GSA), modellers may identify both important (factor prioritization) and non-influential (factor fixing) model input factors. However, despite the potentialities of GSA methods, only few applications have been published in the field of urban drainage modelling. In order to fill this gap this paper presents a comparison among three GSA methods (SRC, Extended-FAST and Morris screening) on an urban drainage storm-water model. In particular, an exhaustive discussion on their peculiarities, applicability, and reliability is presented. Substantial agreement in terms of factors fixing was found between Morris screening and E-FAST methods. In general, the water-quality related factors exhibited higher interactions than factors related to quantity. In contrast to quantity model outputs, quality model outputs were found to be characterized by high non-linearity.
Lingua originaleEnglish
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

sensitivity analysis
water quality
urban drainage
modeling
prioritization
nonlinearity
comparison
method
urban water
water
screening

Cita questo

Global sensitivity analysis for urban water quality modelling: comparison of different methods. / Vanrolleghem, P; Neuman, M.

2012.

Risultato della ricerca: Paper

@conference{ab5d5760f19d41ea8210bf60aefd0243,
title = "Global sensitivity analysis for urban water quality modelling: comparison of different methods",
abstract = "Sensitivity analysis represents an important step in improving the understanding and use of environmental models. Indeed, by means of global sensitivity analysis (GSA), modellers may identify both important (factor prioritization) and non-influential (factor fixing) model input factors. However, despite the potentialities of GSA methods, only few applications have been published in the field of urban drainage modelling. In order to fill this gap this paper presents a comparison among three GSA methods (SRC, Extended-FAST and Morris screening) on an urban drainage storm-water model. In particular, an exhaustive discussion on their peculiarities, applicability, and reliability is presented. Substantial agreement in terms of factors fixing was found between Morris screening and E-FAST methods. In general, the water-quality related factors exhibited higher interactions than factors related to quantity. In contrast to quantity model outputs, quality model outputs were found to be characterized by high non-linearity.",
keywords = "Influence of model input factors; sewer sediments; uncertainty; urban drainage modelling",
author = "{Vanrolleghem, P; Neuman, M} and Gaspare Viviani and Alida Cosenza and Giorgio Mannina",
year = "2012",
language = "English",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Global sensitivity analysis for urban water quality modelling: comparison of different methods

AU - Vanrolleghem, P; Neuman, M

AU - Viviani, Gaspare

AU - Cosenza, Alida

AU - Mannina, Giorgio

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Sensitivity analysis represents an important step in improving the understanding and use of environmental models. Indeed, by means of global sensitivity analysis (GSA), modellers may identify both important (factor prioritization) and non-influential (factor fixing) model input factors. However, despite the potentialities of GSA methods, only few applications have been published in the field of urban drainage modelling. In order to fill this gap this paper presents a comparison among three GSA methods (SRC, Extended-FAST and Morris screening) on an urban drainage storm-water model. In particular, an exhaustive discussion on their peculiarities, applicability, and reliability is presented. Substantial agreement in terms of factors fixing was found between Morris screening and E-FAST methods. In general, the water-quality related factors exhibited higher interactions than factors related to quantity. In contrast to quantity model outputs, quality model outputs were found to be characterized by high non-linearity.

AB - Sensitivity analysis represents an important step in improving the understanding and use of environmental models. Indeed, by means of global sensitivity analysis (GSA), modellers may identify both important (factor prioritization) and non-influential (factor fixing) model input factors. However, despite the potentialities of GSA methods, only few applications have been published in the field of urban drainage modelling. In order to fill this gap this paper presents a comparison among three GSA methods (SRC, Extended-FAST and Morris screening) on an urban drainage storm-water model. In particular, an exhaustive discussion on their peculiarities, applicability, and reliability is presented. Substantial agreement in terms of factors fixing was found between Morris screening and E-FAST methods. In general, the water-quality related factors exhibited higher interactions than factors related to quantity. In contrast to quantity model outputs, quality model outputs were found to be characterized by high non-linearity.

KW - Influence of model input factors; sewer sediments; uncertainty; urban drainage modelling

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/65993

M3 - Paper

ER -