From telescope to binoculars. Dyadic outcome resulting from psychological counselling for infertile couples undergoing ART

Laura Salerno, Gianluca Lo Coco, Dennis M. Kivlighan, Laura Salerno, Zaira Donarelli, Adolfo Allegra, Angelo Marino, Adolfo Allegra, Angelo Alessandro Marino

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

Objective: This longitudinal study aims to evaluate the effect of psychological counselling on quality of life, marital satisfaction and need for parenthood in couples undergoing fertility treatments (ART). Background: Recent guidelines on the ART suggest that psychological counselling should target both members of the infertile couple in order to improve their conjoint management of the infertility-related stress. However, studies on the dyadic outcome of couples are scarce. Methods: 262 patients were originally considered in the study and completed questionnaires on quality of life, need for parenthood and marital satisfaction, before treatment (T1) and at the day of intrauterine insemination/embryo transfer (T2). For the purposes of this study, 34 counselled couples were then matched to 34 non-counselled couples by propensity scores. The Common Fate Model (CFM) was used to examine dyadic changes. Results: Couples receiving counselling had higher dyadic quality of life and lower dyadic stress due to the need for parenthood at T2 compared to non-counselled couples. No differences were found on marital satisfaction. Conclusion: The findings provide support for the effectiveness of counselling on interpersonal outcome. The CFM allows researchers to examine how the dyad as a whole responds to counselling, highlighting the change in the couple’s relational dynamics.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)13-25
Numero di pagine13
RivistaJournal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Volume37
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Telescopes
Counseling
Psychology
Quality of Life
Propensity Score
Insemination
Embryo Transfer
Infertility
Fertility
Longitudinal Studies
Research Personnel
Guidelines

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Psychology(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cita questo

From telescope to binoculars. Dyadic outcome resulting from psychological counselling for infertile couples undergoing ART. / Salerno, Laura; Lo Coco, Gianluca; Kivlighan, Dennis M.; Salerno, Laura; Donarelli, Zaira; Allegra, Adolfo; Marino, Angelo; Allegra, Adolfo; Marino, Angelo Alessandro.

In: Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, Vol. 37, 2019, pag. 13-25.

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Salerno, Laura ; Lo Coco, Gianluca ; Kivlighan, Dennis M. ; Salerno, Laura ; Donarelli, Zaira ; Allegra, Adolfo ; Marino, Angelo ; Allegra, Adolfo ; Marino, Angelo Alessandro. / From telescope to binoculars. Dyadic outcome resulting from psychological counselling for infertile couples undergoing ART. In: Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2019 ; Vol. 37. pagg. 13-25.
@article{0b44c81739f5447b8dde70562c6f68fa,
title = "From telescope to binoculars. Dyadic outcome resulting from psychological counselling for infertile couples undergoing ART",
abstract = "Objective: This longitudinal study aims to evaluate the effect of psychological counselling on quality of life, marital satisfaction and need for parenthood in couples undergoing fertility treatments (ART). Background: Recent guidelines on the ART suggest that psychological counselling should target both members of the infertile couple in order to improve their conjoint management of the infertility-related stress. However, studies on the dyadic outcome of couples are scarce. Methods: 262 patients were originally considered in the study and completed questionnaires on quality of life, need for parenthood and marital satisfaction, before treatment (T1) and at the day of intrauterine insemination/embryo transfer (T2). For the purposes of this study, 34 counselled couples were then matched to 34 non-counselled couples by propensity scores. The Common Fate Model (CFM) was used to examine dyadic changes. Results: Couples receiving counselling had higher dyadic quality of life and lower dyadic stress due to the need for parenthood at T2 compared to non-counselled couples. No differences were found on marital satisfaction. Conclusion: The findings provide support for the effectiveness of counselling on interpersonal outcome. The CFM allows researchers to examine how the dyad as a whole responds to counselling, highlighting the change in the couple’s relational dynamics.",
author = "Laura Salerno and {Lo Coco}, Gianluca and Kivlighan, {Dennis M.} and Laura Salerno and Zaira Donarelli and Adolfo Allegra and Angelo Marino and Adolfo Allegra and Marino, {Angelo Alessandro}",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "13--25",
journal = "Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology",
issn = "0264-6838",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From telescope to binoculars. Dyadic outcome resulting from psychological counselling for infertile couples undergoing ART

AU - Salerno, Laura

AU - Lo Coco, Gianluca

AU - Kivlighan, Dennis M.

AU - Salerno, Laura

AU - Donarelli, Zaira

AU - Allegra, Adolfo

AU - Marino, Angelo

AU - Allegra, Adolfo

AU - Marino, Angelo Alessandro

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Objective: This longitudinal study aims to evaluate the effect of psychological counselling on quality of life, marital satisfaction and need for parenthood in couples undergoing fertility treatments (ART). Background: Recent guidelines on the ART suggest that psychological counselling should target both members of the infertile couple in order to improve their conjoint management of the infertility-related stress. However, studies on the dyadic outcome of couples are scarce. Methods: 262 patients were originally considered in the study and completed questionnaires on quality of life, need for parenthood and marital satisfaction, before treatment (T1) and at the day of intrauterine insemination/embryo transfer (T2). For the purposes of this study, 34 counselled couples were then matched to 34 non-counselled couples by propensity scores. The Common Fate Model (CFM) was used to examine dyadic changes. Results: Couples receiving counselling had higher dyadic quality of life and lower dyadic stress due to the need for parenthood at T2 compared to non-counselled couples. No differences were found on marital satisfaction. Conclusion: The findings provide support for the effectiveness of counselling on interpersonal outcome. The CFM allows researchers to examine how the dyad as a whole responds to counselling, highlighting the change in the couple’s relational dynamics.

AB - Objective: This longitudinal study aims to evaluate the effect of psychological counselling on quality of life, marital satisfaction and need for parenthood in couples undergoing fertility treatments (ART). Background: Recent guidelines on the ART suggest that psychological counselling should target both members of the infertile couple in order to improve their conjoint management of the infertility-related stress. However, studies on the dyadic outcome of couples are scarce. Methods: 262 patients were originally considered in the study and completed questionnaires on quality of life, need for parenthood and marital satisfaction, before treatment (T1) and at the day of intrauterine insemination/embryo transfer (T2). For the purposes of this study, 34 counselled couples were then matched to 34 non-counselled couples by propensity scores. The Common Fate Model (CFM) was used to examine dyadic changes. Results: Couples receiving counselling had higher dyadic quality of life and lower dyadic stress due to the need for parenthood at T2 compared to non-counselled couples. No differences were found on marital satisfaction. Conclusion: The findings provide support for the effectiveness of counselling on interpersonal outcome. The CFM allows researchers to examine how the dyad as a whole responds to counselling, highlighting the change in the couple’s relational dynamics.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/337563

UR - http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/02646838.asp

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 13

EP - 25

JO - Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

JF - Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

SN - 0264-6838

ER -