Feasibility and Acceptability of Office-Based Polypectomy With a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Multicenter Clinical Study

Gloria Calagna, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Salvatore Saitta, Fabio Montella, Francesca Riboni, Gloria Calagna, Stefano Cosma, Davide Dealberti, Carla Pisani

Risultato della ricerca: Article

8 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of office hysteroscopic polypectomy using a novel continuous-flow operative 16F mini-resectoscope. Design: Multicenter prospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification III). Setting: "SS Antonio e Biagio" Hospital, Alessandria, and University "Federico II" of Naples. Patients: One hundred eighty-two patients with endometrial polyps. Interventions: Hysteroscopic polypectomy performed with 16F mini-resectoscope in an office setting, without analgesia and/or anesthesia. Measurements and Main Results: Polypectomy was successfully performed in 175 patients in a single surgical step (96.15%), with only 1 patient (54%) requiring a second office surgical step to complete the surgery. Seven patients (3.84%) were excluded from the analysis of operative parameters because of severe pelvic pain during the office procedure, which required a second inpatient surgical step. No major complications were recorded. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that removal of endometrial polyps using the 16F mini-resectoscope in an office setting is a feasible and safe surgical option. Outpatient see-and-treat polypectomy is an acceptable and effective alternative to inpatient resectoscopic polypectomy.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)418-424
Numero di pagine7
RivistaJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume23
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Multicenter Studies
Polyps
Inpatients
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Pelvic Pain
Advisory Committees
Outpatients
Clinical Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cita questo

Calagna, G., Di Spiezio Sardo, A., Saitta, S., Montella, F., Riboni, F., Calagna, G., ... Pisani, C. (2016). Feasibility and Acceptability of Office-Based Polypectomy With a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Multicenter Clinical Study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 23, 418-424.

Feasibility and Acceptability of Office-Based Polypectomy With a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Multicenter Clinical Study. / Calagna, Gloria; Di Spiezio Sardo, Attilio; Saitta, Salvatore; Montella, Fabio; Riboni, Francesca; Calagna, Gloria; Cosma, Stefano; Dealberti, Davide; Pisani, Carla.

In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Vol. 23, 2016, pag. 418-424.

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Calagna, G, Di Spiezio Sardo, A, Saitta, S, Montella, F, Riboni, F, Calagna, G, Cosma, S, Dealberti, D & Pisani, C 2016, 'Feasibility and Acceptability of Office-Based Polypectomy With a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Multicenter Clinical Study', Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 23, pagg. 418-424.
Calagna, Gloria ; Di Spiezio Sardo, Attilio ; Saitta, Salvatore ; Montella, Fabio ; Riboni, Francesca ; Calagna, Gloria ; Cosma, Stefano ; Dealberti, Davide ; Pisani, Carla. / Feasibility and Acceptability of Office-Based Polypectomy With a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Multicenter Clinical Study. In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016 ; Vol. 23. pagg. 418-424.
@article{aad156aef1aa49779c10d3246d7965ac,
title = "Feasibility and Acceptability of Office-Based Polypectomy With a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Multicenter Clinical Study",
abstract = "Study Objective: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of office hysteroscopic polypectomy using a novel continuous-flow operative 16F mini-resectoscope. Design: Multicenter prospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification III). Setting: {"}SS Antonio e Biagio{"} Hospital, Alessandria, and University {"}Federico II{"} of Naples. Patients: One hundred eighty-two patients with endometrial polyps. Interventions: Hysteroscopic polypectomy performed with 16F mini-resectoscope in an office setting, without analgesia and/or anesthesia. Measurements and Main Results: Polypectomy was successfully performed in 175 patients in a single surgical step (96.15{\%}), with only 1 patient (54{\%}) requiring a second office surgical step to complete the surgery. Seven patients (3.84{\%}) were excluded from the analysis of operative parameters because of severe pelvic pain during the office procedure, which required a second inpatient surgical step. No major complications were recorded. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that removal of endometrial polyps using the 16F mini-resectoscope in an office setting is a feasible and safe surgical option. Outpatient see-and-treat polypectomy is an acceptable and effective alternative to inpatient resectoscopic polypectomy.",
author = "Gloria Calagna and {Di Spiezio Sardo}, Attilio and Salvatore Saitta and Fabio Montella and Francesca Riboni and Gloria Calagna and Stefano Cosma and Davide Dealberti and Carla Pisani",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "418--424",
journal = "Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology",
issn = "1553-4650",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility and Acceptability of Office-Based Polypectomy With a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Multicenter Clinical Study

AU - Calagna, Gloria

AU - Di Spiezio Sardo, Attilio

AU - Saitta, Salvatore

AU - Montella, Fabio

AU - Riboni, Francesca

AU - Calagna, Gloria

AU - Cosma, Stefano

AU - Dealberti, Davide

AU - Pisani, Carla

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Study Objective: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of office hysteroscopic polypectomy using a novel continuous-flow operative 16F mini-resectoscope. Design: Multicenter prospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification III). Setting: "SS Antonio e Biagio" Hospital, Alessandria, and University "Federico II" of Naples. Patients: One hundred eighty-two patients with endometrial polyps. Interventions: Hysteroscopic polypectomy performed with 16F mini-resectoscope in an office setting, without analgesia and/or anesthesia. Measurements and Main Results: Polypectomy was successfully performed in 175 patients in a single surgical step (96.15%), with only 1 patient (54%) requiring a second office surgical step to complete the surgery. Seven patients (3.84%) were excluded from the analysis of operative parameters because of severe pelvic pain during the office procedure, which required a second inpatient surgical step. No major complications were recorded. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that removal of endometrial polyps using the 16F mini-resectoscope in an office setting is a feasible and safe surgical option. Outpatient see-and-treat polypectomy is an acceptable and effective alternative to inpatient resectoscopic polypectomy.

AB - Study Objective: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of office hysteroscopic polypectomy using a novel continuous-flow operative 16F mini-resectoscope. Design: Multicenter prospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification III). Setting: "SS Antonio e Biagio" Hospital, Alessandria, and University "Federico II" of Naples. Patients: One hundred eighty-two patients with endometrial polyps. Interventions: Hysteroscopic polypectomy performed with 16F mini-resectoscope in an office setting, without analgesia and/or anesthesia. Measurements and Main Results: Polypectomy was successfully performed in 175 patients in a single surgical step (96.15%), with only 1 patient (54%) requiring a second office surgical step to complete the surgery. Seven patients (3.84%) were excluded from the analysis of operative parameters because of severe pelvic pain during the office procedure, which required a second inpatient surgical step. No major complications were recorded. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that removal of endometrial polyps using the 16F mini-resectoscope in an office setting is a feasible and safe surgical option. Outpatient see-and-treat polypectomy is an acceptable and effective alternative to inpatient resectoscopic polypectomy.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/176227

UR - http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/704371/description#description

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 418

EP - 424

JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

SN - 1553-4650

ER -