Evaluating the statistical methodology of randomized trials on dentin hypersensitivity management

Giuseppe Pizzo, Domenica Matranga, Federico Matera, Giuseppe Pizzo

Risultato della ricerca: Articlepeer review

3 Citazioni (Scopus)


The present study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and quality of statistical methodology used in clinical studies on dentin hypersensitivity management. An electronic search was performed for data published from 2009 to 2014 by using PubMed, Ovid/MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary search terms were used in combination. Eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of desensitizing agents in terms of reducing dentin hypersensitivity. A total of 40 studies were considered eligible for assessment of quality statistical methodology. The four main concerns identified were i) use of nonparametric tests in the presence of large samples, coupled with lack of information about normality and equality of variances of the response; ii) lack of P-value adjustment for multiple comparisons; iii) failure to account for interactions between treatment and follow-up time; and iv) no information about the number of teeth examined per patient and the consequent lack of cluster-specific approach in data analysis. Owing to these concerns, statistical methodology was judged as inappropriate in 77.1% of the 35 studies that used parametric methods. Additional studies with appropriate statistical analysis are required to obtain appropriate assessment of the efficacy of desensitizing agents.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)461-468
Numero di pagine8
RivistaJournal of oral science
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • ???subjectarea.asjc.3500.3500???


Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Evaluating the statistical methodology of randomized trials on dentin hypersensitivity management'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo