Endometrial cancer: Robotic versus Laparoscopic treatment. Preliminary report

Antonino Perino, Gaspare Gulotta, Giorgio Romano, Antonino Agrusa, Gaspare Cucinella, Gloria Calagna, Giuseppe Di Buono, Valentina Billone, Maria Margherita Triolo, Vincenzo Sorce, Gulotta, Romano, Agrusa, Di Buono, Sorce, Leonardo Gulotta

Risultato della ricerca: Article

7 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Laparoscopic approach is today the standard treatment for benign and malignant gynecological pathologies. To traditional laparoscopic surgery in the last 10 years we can add the possibility to use a robotic platform. The adoption of this system allows undoubted advantages as the three-dimensional vision, the absence of the physiological tremor with enhanced ergonomics and possibility of using articulable tools. In this study we analyzed the results of 18 patients with endometrial cancer (Stage I) treated with robotic approach. The results were compared with a selected sample of 26 patients, with the same characteristics, treated with traditional laparoscopic approach in the same period by the same surgical team. The mean total operative time was significantly longer for robotic than laparoscopic group (125.6 min vs 102.3 min). However, if to this operative time we remove the time of preparation (docking time) we obtain the following results: 102.5 min for robotic group and 95.7 min for the laparoscopic control group. Intra-operative blood loss are significantly lower in the robotic group than in laparoscopic group. The robotic treatment of gynecological cancer is a safe and feasible technique. The oncological results are also equivalent to those of traditional laparoscopic surgery with advantages in terms of precision and reduction of intraoperative bleeding. Additional clinical studies on larger samples and heterogeneous patients are necessary in order to clarify the real advantages of robotic treatment.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)283-287
Numero di pagine5
RivistaGiornale Italiano di Ostetricia e Ginecologia
Volume37
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Robotics
Endometrial Neoplasms
Operative Time
Laparoscopy
Therapeutics
Human Engineering
Tremor
Pathology
Hemorrhage
Control Groups
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cita questo

Endometrial cancer: Robotic versus Laparoscopic treatment. Preliminary report. / Perino, Antonino; Gulotta, Gaspare; Romano, Giorgio; Agrusa, Antonino; Cucinella, Gaspare; Calagna, Gloria; Di Buono, Giuseppe; Billone, Valentina; Triolo, Maria Margherita; Sorce, Vincenzo; Gulotta; Romano; Agrusa; Di Buono; Sorce; Gulotta, Leonardo.

In: Giornale Italiano di Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Vol. 37, 2015, pag. 283-287.

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Perino, A, Gulotta, G, Romano, G, Agrusa, A, Cucinella, G, Calagna, G, Di Buono, G, Billone, V, Triolo, MM, Sorce, V, Gulotta, Romano, Agrusa, Di Buono, Sorce & Gulotta, L 2015, 'Endometrial cancer: Robotic versus Laparoscopic treatment. Preliminary report', Giornale Italiano di Ostetricia e Ginecologia, vol. 37, pagg. 283-287.
Perino A, Gulotta G, Romano G, Agrusa A, Cucinella G, Calagna G e altri. Endometrial cancer: Robotic versus Laparoscopic treatment. Preliminary report. Giornale Italiano di Ostetricia e Ginecologia. 2015;37:283-287.
Perino, Antonino ; Gulotta, Gaspare ; Romano, Giorgio ; Agrusa, Antonino ; Cucinella, Gaspare ; Calagna, Gloria ; Di Buono, Giuseppe ; Billone, Valentina ; Triolo, Maria Margherita ; Sorce, Vincenzo ; Gulotta ; Romano ; Agrusa ; Di Buono ; Sorce ; Gulotta, Leonardo. / Endometrial cancer: Robotic versus Laparoscopic treatment. Preliminary report. In: Giornale Italiano di Ostetricia e Ginecologia. 2015 ; Vol. 37. pagg. 283-287.
@article{7640c7f6f5fc473a92d2bb5a5f73f90c,
title = "Endometrial cancer: Robotic versus Laparoscopic treatment. Preliminary report",
abstract = "Laparoscopic approach is today the standard treatment for benign and malignant gynecological pathologies. To traditional laparoscopic surgery in the last 10 years we can add the possibility to use a robotic platform. The adoption of this system allows undoubted advantages as the three-dimensional vision, the absence of the physiological tremor with enhanced ergonomics and possibility of using articulable tools. In this study we analyzed the results of 18 patients with endometrial cancer (Stage I) treated with robotic approach. The results were compared with a selected sample of 26 patients, with the same characteristics, treated with traditional laparoscopic approach in the same period by the same surgical team. The mean total operative time was significantly longer for robotic than laparoscopic group (125.6 min vs 102.3 min). However, if to this operative time we remove the time of preparation (docking time) we obtain the following results: 102.5 min for robotic group and 95.7 min for the laparoscopic control group. Intra-operative blood loss are significantly lower in the robotic group than in laparoscopic group. The robotic treatment of gynecological cancer is a safe and feasible technique. The oncological results are also equivalent to those of traditional laparoscopic surgery with advantages in terms of precision and reduction of intraoperative bleeding. Additional clinical studies on larger samples and heterogeneous patients are necessary in order to clarify the real advantages of robotic treatment.",
author = "Antonino Perino and Gaspare Gulotta and Giorgio Romano and Antonino Agrusa and Gaspare Cucinella and Gloria Calagna and {Di Buono}, Giuseppe and Valentina Billone and Triolo, {Maria Margherita} and Vincenzo Sorce and Gulotta and Romano and Agrusa and {Di Buono} and Sorce and Leonardo Gulotta",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "283--287",
journal = "Giornale Italiano di Ostetricia e Ginecologia",
issn = "0391-9013",
publisher = "CIC Edizioni Internazionali s.r.l.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endometrial cancer: Robotic versus Laparoscopic treatment. Preliminary report

AU - Perino, Antonino

AU - Gulotta, Gaspare

AU - Romano, Giorgio

AU - Agrusa, Antonino

AU - Cucinella, Gaspare

AU - Calagna, Gloria

AU - Di Buono, Giuseppe

AU - Billone, Valentina

AU - Triolo, Maria Margherita

AU - Sorce, Vincenzo

AU - Gulotta, null

AU - Romano, null

AU - Agrusa, null

AU - Di Buono, null

AU - Sorce, null

AU - Gulotta, Leonardo

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Laparoscopic approach is today the standard treatment for benign and malignant gynecological pathologies. To traditional laparoscopic surgery in the last 10 years we can add the possibility to use a robotic platform. The adoption of this system allows undoubted advantages as the three-dimensional vision, the absence of the physiological tremor with enhanced ergonomics and possibility of using articulable tools. In this study we analyzed the results of 18 patients with endometrial cancer (Stage I) treated with robotic approach. The results were compared with a selected sample of 26 patients, with the same characteristics, treated with traditional laparoscopic approach in the same period by the same surgical team. The mean total operative time was significantly longer for robotic than laparoscopic group (125.6 min vs 102.3 min). However, if to this operative time we remove the time of preparation (docking time) we obtain the following results: 102.5 min for robotic group and 95.7 min for the laparoscopic control group. Intra-operative blood loss are significantly lower in the robotic group than in laparoscopic group. The robotic treatment of gynecological cancer is a safe and feasible technique. The oncological results are also equivalent to those of traditional laparoscopic surgery with advantages in terms of precision and reduction of intraoperative bleeding. Additional clinical studies on larger samples and heterogeneous patients are necessary in order to clarify the real advantages of robotic treatment.

AB - Laparoscopic approach is today the standard treatment for benign and malignant gynecological pathologies. To traditional laparoscopic surgery in the last 10 years we can add the possibility to use a robotic platform. The adoption of this system allows undoubted advantages as the three-dimensional vision, the absence of the physiological tremor with enhanced ergonomics and possibility of using articulable tools. In this study we analyzed the results of 18 patients with endometrial cancer (Stage I) treated with robotic approach. The results were compared with a selected sample of 26 patients, with the same characteristics, treated with traditional laparoscopic approach in the same period by the same surgical team. The mean total operative time was significantly longer for robotic than laparoscopic group (125.6 min vs 102.3 min). However, if to this operative time we remove the time of preparation (docking time) we obtain the following results: 102.5 min for robotic group and 95.7 min for the laparoscopic control group. Intra-operative blood loss are significantly lower in the robotic group than in laparoscopic group. The robotic treatment of gynecological cancer is a safe and feasible technique. The oncological results are also equivalent to those of traditional laparoscopic surgery with advantages in terms of precision and reduction of intraoperative bleeding. Additional clinical studies on larger samples and heterogeneous patients are necessary in order to clarify the real advantages of robotic treatment.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/200371

UR - http://www.giog.it/common/php/portiere.php?ID=f4a27e0fc2964431ca4a2479d602ee29

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 283

EP - 287

JO - Giornale Italiano di Ostetricia e Ginecologia

JF - Giornale Italiano di Ostetricia e Ginecologia

SN - 0391-9013

ER -

Accesso al documento