Does Public Deliberation really Need Normative Constraints? Recovering the Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory

Francesca Piazza; Salvatore Di Piazza

Does Public Deliberation really Need Normative Constraints? Recovering the Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory

Risultato della ricerca: Chapter

Abstract

There was recently an attempt to correlate some sectors of thestudies on argumentation and the theory of democracy. Therelationship between these two areas concerns the fact that inboth cases there is a significant interest in normative modelsof good argumentation. In these models there is no place forrhetoric. Our work has a twofold aim: (1) to show that,starting from the Aristotelian rhetoric, it is possible to developa more suitable model of argumentation in the public sphereand (2) to doubt the very need to identify normativeconstraints for this type of argument.

Lingua originale	English
Titolo della pubblicazione ospite	Argumentation and Reasoned Action. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015, Volume I
Numero di pagine	22
Stato di pubblicazione	Published - 2016

Altri file e collegamenti

OA Link

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Does Public Deliberation really Need Normative Constraints? Recovering the Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo

@inbook{16c22a017cd448d487db9a233328ca75,

title = "Does Public Deliberation really Need Normative Constraints? Recovering the Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory",

abstract = "There was recently an attempt to correlate some sectors of thestudies on argumentation and the theory of democracy. Therelationship between these two areas concerns the fact that inboth cases there is a significant interest in normative modelsof good argumentation. In these models there is no place forrhetoric. Our work has a twofold aim: (1) to show that,starting from the Aristotelian rhetoric, it is possible to developa more suitable model of argumentation in the public sphereand (2) to doubt the very need to identify normativeconstraints for this type of argument.",

author = "Francesca Piazza and {Di Piazza}, Salvatore",

year = "2016",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-84890-211-4",

booktitle = "Argumentation and Reasoned Action. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015, Volume I",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Does Public Deliberation really Need Normative Constraints? Recovering the Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory

AU - Piazza, Francesca

AU - Di Piazza, Salvatore

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - There was recently an attempt to correlate some sectors of thestudies on argumentation and the theory of democracy. Therelationship between these two areas concerns the fact that inboth cases there is a significant interest in normative modelsof good argumentation. In these models there is no place forrhetoric. Our work has a twofold aim: (1) to show that,starting from the Aristotelian rhetoric, it is possible to developa more suitable model of argumentation in the public sphereand (2) to doubt the very need to identify normativeconstraints for this type of argument.

AB - There was recently an attempt to correlate some sectors of thestudies on argumentation and the theory of democracy. Therelationship between these two areas concerns the fact that inboth cases there is a significant interest in normative modelsof good argumentation. In these models there is no place forrhetoric. Our work has a twofold aim: (1) to show that,starting from the Aristotelian rhetoric, it is possible to developa more suitable model of argumentation in the public sphereand (2) to doubt the very need to identify normativeconstraints for this type of argument.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/202248

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-84890-211-4

BT - Argumentation and Reasoned Action. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015, Volume I

ER -