TY - JOUR
T1 - Diritti fondamentali e poteri di determinazionbe nello Stato costituzionale di diritto
AU - Celano, Bruno
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Bills of rights in contemporary constitutional democracies lend themselves to a pluralistic, rather than monistic or "irenistic", conception. Constitutional rights, principles, and values often conflict; they are plural, indeterminate, incommensurable. Thus, in constitutional democracies "powers of determination" (i.e., institutions whose task is to balance constitutional rights and values in their application to specific kinds of cases) are needed. Are powers of determination (e.g. judicial review of legislation, or constitutional amending by democratic assemblies) compatible with the ambitions of contemporary constitutionalism?
AB - Bills of rights in contemporary constitutional democracies lend themselves to a pluralistic, rather than monistic or "irenistic", conception. Constitutional rights, principles, and values often conflict; they are plural, indeterminate, incommensurable. Thus, in constitutional democracies "powers of determination" (i.e., institutions whose task is to balance constitutional rights and values in their application to specific kinds of cases) are needed. Are powers of determination (e.g. judicial review of legislation, or constitutional amending by democratic assemblies) compatible with the ambitions of contemporary constitutionalism?
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/9548
M3 - Article
SN - 0394-7297
VL - 19, n. 3
SP - 427
EP - 444
JO - Filosofia Politica
JF - Filosofia Politica
ER -