Compensatio lucri cum damno e tipicità dei danni punitivi: una prospettiva critica

Risultato della ricerca: Article

Abstract

The recent jurisprudence seems to take a case by case approach that raise concerns on the respect of the principle of typicality and predictability of punitive damages. The functional approach gives to the judge a great power in the concrete case, with a balance of interest similar to the one envisage by art. 2043 cod. civ. The subrogation criterion in trilateral relations, moreover, would lead to a reverse typicality, so punitive damages would be atypical and unforeseeable -, while the cases regulated by the principle of indifference would be typical.
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)583-593
Numero di pagine11
RivistaLA NUOVA GIURISPRUDENZA CIVILE COMMENTATA
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2019

Cita questo

@article{4d95995be5654f32a720bb0b3e7ccc23,
title = "Compensatio lucri cum damno e tipicit{\`a} dei danni punitivi: una prospettiva critica",
abstract = "The recent jurisprudence seems to take a case by case approach that raise concerns on the respect of the principle of typicality and predictability of punitive damages. The functional approach gives to the judge a great power in the concrete case, with a balance of interest similar to the one envisage by art. 2043 cod. civ. The subrogation criterion in trilateral relations, moreover, would lead to a reverse typicality, so punitive damages would be atypical and unforeseeable -, while the cases regulated by the principle of indifference would be typical.",
author = "Giorgio Mattarella",
year = "2019",
language = "Italian",
pages = "583--593",
journal = "LA NUOVA GIURISPRUDENZA CIVILE COMMENTATA",
issn = "1593-7305",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compensatio lucri cum damno e tipicità dei danni punitivi: una prospettiva critica

AU - Mattarella, Giorgio

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The recent jurisprudence seems to take a case by case approach that raise concerns on the respect of the principle of typicality and predictability of punitive damages. The functional approach gives to the judge a great power in the concrete case, with a balance of interest similar to the one envisage by art. 2043 cod. civ. The subrogation criterion in trilateral relations, moreover, would lead to a reverse typicality, so punitive damages would be atypical and unforeseeable -, while the cases regulated by the principle of indifference would be typical.

AB - The recent jurisprudence seems to take a case by case approach that raise concerns on the respect of the principle of typicality and predictability of punitive damages. The functional approach gives to the judge a great power in the concrete case, with a balance of interest similar to the one envisage by art. 2043 cod. civ. The subrogation criterion in trilateral relations, moreover, would lead to a reverse typicality, so punitive damages would be atypical and unforeseeable -, while the cases regulated by the principle of indifference would be typical.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/365515

M3 - Article

SP - 583

EP - 593

JO - LA NUOVA GIURISPRUDENZA CIVILE COMMENTATA

JF - LA NUOVA GIURISPRUDENZA CIVILE COMMENTATA

SN - 1593-7305

ER -