Comparison of central venous catheterization with and without ultrasound guide

Massimo Cajozzo, Vito Barbera

Risultato della ricerca: Articlepeer review

38 Citazioni (Scopus)


Purpose: To compare the effectiveness, safety and time needed to perform central venous catheterization (CVC) inthe presence or absence of an ultrasound (US) guide.Methods: Between January 1999 and February 2002 we performed CVCs in 196 patients: 105 patients received USguided CVC (group I) and 91 patients had CVC without US guide (group II).Results: The average time to perform CVC was shorter with US guide (4 vs 7min). The utilization of the US guidewas also associated with improved success (98.09% vs 91.2%, p < 0.025) and lack of major complications (0% vs 9.8%,p < 0.001).Conclusions: US-guided CVC affords an easier, safer and more rapid cannulation of a central vein. It is especiallyhelpful in those patients with anatomical variation or difficult veins (small or not visible, non-palpable landmarks)and in those with coagulative disorders.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)199-202
Numero di pagine4
RivistaTransfusion and Apheresis Science
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2004

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • ???subjectarea.asjc.2700.2720???


Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Comparison of central venous catheterization with and without ultrasound guide'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo