Until recently, Descartes' idea that the human mind is, by definition, a non-extended entity (res cogitans, non extensa), enclosed in the body but constitutionally different from common bodily and external realities, found wide acceptance among students of cognitive sciences. But in the past few years the barriers between outer and inner worlds have begun to blur, projecting the process of cognition as a complex distributed phenomenon. According to the so-called distributed cognition thesis (and its more “radical” version, the extended mind hypothesis), “the thinker in this world is a very special medium that can provide coordination among many structured media – some internal, some external, some embodied in artefacts, some in ideas, and some in social relationships” (Hutchins 1995: 316). The case of Lucretius and Epicurean philosophy discussed in this paper aims to show that the narrow fortress of the knowing self is not as ancient as some present-day theorists are inclined to think, and that the very concept of distributed cognition, broadly construed, has a history of its own with deep roots in Greco-Roman physiology. Lucretius' poem provides especially compelling evidence that, one the one hand, Epicurean epistemology conceives of cognition as a material process extended across the borders of atomic bodies, and that, on the other hand, true knowledge can be achieved only through cooperative didactic techniques. Standing at the crossroads between poetry and philosophy, Lucretius' didactic method tries to involve the addressee (both intellectually and emotionally) in the cooperative construction of an internalized cognitive artefact: the image of the atomic cosmos, faithfully reflected in the text.
|Titolo della pubblicazione ospite||Approaches to Lucretius: Traditions and Innovations in Reading the De Rerum Natura|
|Numero di pagine||21|
|Stato di pubblicazione||Published - 2020|
Tutrone, F. (2020). Coming to Know Epicurus’ Truth: Distributed Cognition in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. In Approaches to Lucretius: Traditions and Innovations in Reading the De Rerum Natura (pagg. 80-100)