Azione di classe a tutela dei consumatori e comportamenti anticoncorrenziali:criticità (e velleità) di un tentativo di trade-off

Risultato della ricerca: Chapter

Abstract

The essay concerns the italian disciplin on the opt-in class actions, as ruled by article 140 bis of consumer code, with special reference its recourse for damages actions downstream an anticompetitive behaviour. The Author examines the main cornerstones of the collective redress mechanism, also in comparison with other foreign experiences, such as the US federal one , by focusing on its pros and cons of the domestic regime, mainly the bottleneck for the access to the remedy (the requirements for assessing whether the "class" exists or not) and the likely outcome of a equitative quantification of individual damages to be awarded. The latter, in particilular, is addressed as an embedded deterrent to the recourse to the collective remedy
Lingua originaleItalian
Titolo della pubblicazione ospiteStudi in memoria di Giovanni Gabrielli
Pagine359-379
Numero di pagine21
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2018

Cita questo

@inbook{dd86ce7785de4f44904c7899e570f976,
title = "Azione di classe a tutela dei consumatori e comportamenti anticoncorrenziali:criticit{\`a} (e velleit{\`a}) di un tentativo di trade-off",
abstract = "The essay concerns the italian disciplin on the opt-in class actions, as ruled by article 140 bis of consumer code, with special reference its recourse for damages actions downstream an anticompetitive behaviour. The Author examines the main cornerstones of the collective redress mechanism, also in comparison with other foreign experiences, such as the US federal one , by focusing on its pros and cons of the domestic regime, mainly the bottleneck for the access to the remedy (the requirements for assessing whether the {"}class{"} exists or not) and the likely outcome of a equitative quantification of individual damages to be awarded. The latter, in particilular, is addressed as an embedded deterrent to the recourse to the collective remedy",
author = "Enrico Camilleri",
year = "2018",
language = "Italian",
isbn = "978-88-495-3228-9",
pages = "359--379",
booktitle = "Studi in memoria di Giovanni Gabrielli",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Azione di classe a tutela dei consumatori e comportamenti anticoncorrenziali:criticità (e velleità) di un tentativo di trade-off

AU - Camilleri, Enrico

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The essay concerns the italian disciplin on the opt-in class actions, as ruled by article 140 bis of consumer code, with special reference its recourse for damages actions downstream an anticompetitive behaviour. The Author examines the main cornerstones of the collective redress mechanism, also in comparison with other foreign experiences, such as the US federal one , by focusing on its pros and cons of the domestic regime, mainly the bottleneck for the access to the remedy (the requirements for assessing whether the "class" exists or not) and the likely outcome of a equitative quantification of individual damages to be awarded. The latter, in particilular, is addressed as an embedded deterrent to the recourse to the collective remedy

AB - The essay concerns the italian disciplin on the opt-in class actions, as ruled by article 140 bis of consumer code, with special reference its recourse for damages actions downstream an anticompetitive behaviour. The Author examines the main cornerstones of the collective redress mechanism, also in comparison with other foreign experiences, such as the US federal one , by focusing on its pros and cons of the domestic regime, mainly the bottleneck for the access to the remedy (the requirements for assessing whether the "class" exists or not) and the likely outcome of a equitative quantification of individual damages to be awarded. The latter, in particilular, is addressed as an embedded deterrent to the recourse to the collective remedy

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/318790

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-88-495-3228-9

SP - 359

EP - 379

BT - Studi in memoria di Giovanni Gabrielli

ER -