TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of genetically modified maize Bt11 x MIR162 x 1507 x GA21 and three subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-DE-2010-86)
AU - Manachini, Barbara Rosy Ines
AU - Manachini, Barbara
AU - Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
AU - Neri, Franco Maria
AU - Sweet, Jeremy
AU - Jones, Huw
AU - Lanzoni, Anna
AU - Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen
AU - Jones, Huw
AU - Nogué, Fabien
AU - Ardizzone, Michele
AU - Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
AU - Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
AU - Guerche, Philippe
AU - Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
AU - Neri, Franco Maria
AU - Federici, Silvia
AU - Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
AU - Robaglia, Christophe
AU - Birch, Andrew Nicholas
AU - Naegeli, Hanspeter
AU - Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
AU - Neri, Franco Maria
AU - Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni
AU - De Schrijver, Adinda
AU - Rostoks, Nils
AU - Casacuberta, Josep
AU - Nogué, Fabien
AU - Messéan, Antoine
AU - Tebbe, Christoph
AU - Birch, Andrew Nicholas
AU - Naegeli, Hanspeter
AU - Visioli, Francesco
AU - Gennaro, Andrea
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - In this opinion, the GMO Panel assessed the four-event stack maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 and three of its subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and seven of their combinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events or the seven subcombinations leading to modification of the original conclusions were identified. Based on the molecular, agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics, the combination of the single events in the four-event stack maize did not give rise to food/feed safety issues. Based on the nutritional assessment of the compositional characteristics of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21, foods and feeds derived from the genetically modified (GM) maize are expected to have the same nutritional impact as those derived from non-GM maize varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to and as safe as its non-GM comparator in the context of the scope of this application. For the three subcombinations included in the scope, for which no experimental data were provided, the GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events and concluded that their combinations would not raise safety concerns. These maize subcombinations are therefore expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 and its subcombinations. A minority opinion expressed by a GMO Panel member is appended to this opinion.
AB - In this opinion, the GMO Panel assessed the four-event stack maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 and three of its subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and seven of their combinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events or the seven subcombinations leading to modification of the original conclusions were identified. Based on the molecular, agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics, the combination of the single events in the four-event stack maize did not give rise to food/feed safety issues. Based on the nutritional assessment of the compositional characteristics of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21, foods and feeds derived from the genetically modified (GM) maize are expected to have the same nutritional impact as those derived from non-GM maize varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to and as safe as its non-GM comparator in the context of the scope of this application. For the three subcombinations included in the scope, for which no experimental data were provided, the GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events and concluded that their combinations would not raise safety concerns. These maize subcombinations are therefore expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize Bt11 × MIR162 × 1507 × GA21 and its subcombinations. A minority opinion expressed by a GMO Panel member is appended to this opinion.
KW - 1507
KW - Animal Science and Zoology
KW - Bt11
KW - Food Science
KW - GA21
KW - GMO
KW - MIR162
KW - Microbiology
KW - Parasitology
KW - Plant Science
KW - Veterinary (miscellaneous)
KW - insect resistant and herbicide tolerant
KW - maize (Zea mays)
KW - 1507
KW - Animal Science and Zoology
KW - Bt11
KW - Food Science
KW - GA21
KW - GMO
KW - MIR162
KW - Microbiology
KW - Parasitology
KW - Plant Science
KW - Veterinary (miscellaneous)
KW - insect resistant and herbicide tolerant
KW - maize (Zea mays)
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/358394
M3 - Article
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 16
SP - 1
EP - 35
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
ER -