Asking for medical help by posting on the net: genre, functions and ethical issues

Risultato della ricerca: Other contribution

Abstract

On the basis of the growing of the number of sites related to health issues and online conversation, statistical research tend to acknowledge that the communication practices of health message boards have significant roles to play in the era of online counseling (Anderson, 2003; Kim & Yoon, 2011; Mulholland, 1999; Eysenbach and Diepgen 1999; O'Connor and Johanson 2000; Shuyler and Knight 2003; Gooden and Winefield 2007). However, one of the main worries concerning these spaces has been the uncontrolled information that is provided by users with no defined roles and who do not/cannot take responsibility for what they say. Previous studies were intended to explore how people discussing health issues use health-related online communities or doctoranswers support frames to access information and support. This research, conversely, explores the heterogeneous territory of new media health care discourse questioning whether Computer Mediated Medical Communication may represent a new genre and consequently may address new functions (Campagna et al., 2012). In addition, starting from the most common definition of medical ethics, the study investigates whether CMMC can meet the expectations of the patient, the role of the physician and eventually how doctors address issues such as the individuality of the medical response and the self-positioning with respect to the certainty of virtual diagnoses. In particular, this paper examines a wide array of authentic examples from medical message boards analyzing by means of Discourse Analysis the ways in which participants construct positions and commitment toward advice, opinions and suggestions (Van der Auwera and Plungian, 1998; Nuyts, 2001; Bybee et al. 1994; Cornillie 2009; Marìn 2004; Hyland, 2002).The analysis attempts to understand how health communication is changing in an online environment and what results are produced by the shift from a doctorto- patient frame to user-to-user frame in terms of authorship and responsibility toward utterances.
Lingua originaleEnglish
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

genre
health
responsibility
individuality
internet community
medical ethics
discourse analysis
new media
counseling
conversation
physician
health care
discourse
communication

Cita questo

@misc{dcc95de326d2443ea2c17b71b64923e1,
title = "Asking for medical help by posting on the net: genre, functions and ethical issues",
abstract = "On the basis of the growing of the number of sites related to health issues and online conversation, statistical research tend to acknowledge that the communication practices of health message boards have significant roles to play in the era of online counseling (Anderson, 2003; Kim & Yoon, 2011; Mulholland, 1999; Eysenbach and Diepgen 1999; O'Connor and Johanson 2000; Shuyler and Knight 2003; Gooden and Winefield 2007). However, one of the main worries concerning these spaces has been the uncontrolled information that is provided by users with no defined roles and who do not/cannot take responsibility for what they say. Previous studies were intended to explore how people discussing health issues use health-related online communities or doctoranswers support frames to access information and support. This research, conversely, explores the heterogeneous territory of new media health care discourse questioning whether Computer Mediated Medical Communication may represent a new genre and consequently may address new functions (Campagna et al., 2012). In addition, starting from the most common definition of medical ethics, the study investigates whether CMMC can meet the expectations of the patient, the role of the physician and eventually how doctors address issues such as the individuality of the medical response and the self-positioning with respect to the certainty of virtual diagnoses. In particular, this paper examines a wide array of authentic examples from medical message boards analyzing by means of Discourse Analysis the ways in which participants construct positions and commitment toward advice, opinions and suggestions (Van der Auwera and Plungian, 1998; Nuyts, 2001; Bybee et al. 1994; Cornillie 2009; Mar{\`i}n 2004; Hyland, 2002).The analysis attempts to understand how health communication is changing in an online environment and what results are produced by the shift from a doctorto- patient frame to user-to-user frame in terms of authorship and responsibility toward utterances.",
author = "Zummo, {Marianna Lya}",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Asking for medical help by posting on the net: genre, functions and ethical issues

AU - Zummo, Marianna Lya

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - On the basis of the growing of the number of sites related to health issues and online conversation, statistical research tend to acknowledge that the communication practices of health message boards have significant roles to play in the era of online counseling (Anderson, 2003; Kim & Yoon, 2011; Mulholland, 1999; Eysenbach and Diepgen 1999; O'Connor and Johanson 2000; Shuyler and Knight 2003; Gooden and Winefield 2007). However, one of the main worries concerning these spaces has been the uncontrolled information that is provided by users with no defined roles and who do not/cannot take responsibility for what they say. Previous studies were intended to explore how people discussing health issues use health-related online communities or doctoranswers support frames to access information and support. This research, conversely, explores the heterogeneous territory of new media health care discourse questioning whether Computer Mediated Medical Communication may represent a new genre and consequently may address new functions (Campagna et al., 2012). In addition, starting from the most common definition of medical ethics, the study investigates whether CMMC can meet the expectations of the patient, the role of the physician and eventually how doctors address issues such as the individuality of the medical response and the self-positioning with respect to the certainty of virtual diagnoses. In particular, this paper examines a wide array of authentic examples from medical message boards analyzing by means of Discourse Analysis the ways in which participants construct positions and commitment toward advice, opinions and suggestions (Van der Auwera and Plungian, 1998; Nuyts, 2001; Bybee et al. 1994; Cornillie 2009; Marìn 2004; Hyland, 2002).The analysis attempts to understand how health communication is changing in an online environment and what results are produced by the shift from a doctorto- patient frame to user-to-user frame in terms of authorship and responsibility toward utterances.

AB - On the basis of the growing of the number of sites related to health issues and online conversation, statistical research tend to acknowledge that the communication practices of health message boards have significant roles to play in the era of online counseling (Anderson, 2003; Kim & Yoon, 2011; Mulholland, 1999; Eysenbach and Diepgen 1999; O'Connor and Johanson 2000; Shuyler and Knight 2003; Gooden and Winefield 2007). However, one of the main worries concerning these spaces has been the uncontrolled information that is provided by users with no defined roles and who do not/cannot take responsibility for what they say. Previous studies were intended to explore how people discussing health issues use health-related online communities or doctoranswers support frames to access information and support. This research, conversely, explores the heterogeneous territory of new media health care discourse questioning whether Computer Mediated Medical Communication may represent a new genre and consequently may address new functions (Campagna et al., 2012). In addition, starting from the most common definition of medical ethics, the study investigates whether CMMC can meet the expectations of the patient, the role of the physician and eventually how doctors address issues such as the individuality of the medical response and the self-positioning with respect to the certainty of virtual diagnoses. In particular, this paper examines a wide array of authentic examples from medical message boards analyzing by means of Discourse Analysis the ways in which participants construct positions and commitment toward advice, opinions and suggestions (Van der Auwera and Plungian, 1998; Nuyts, 2001; Bybee et al. 1994; Cornillie 2009; Marìn 2004; Hyland, 2002).The analysis attempts to understand how health communication is changing in an online environment and what results are produced by the shift from a doctorto- patient frame to user-to-user frame in terms of authorship and responsibility toward utterances.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/99083

M3 - Other contribution

ER -