TY - JOUR
T1 - Anakinra drug retention rate and predictive factors of long-term response in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult onset still disease
AU - Maggio, Maria Cristina
AU - Alessio, Maria
AU - Talarico, Rosaria
AU - Gallizzi, Romina
AU - La Torre, Francesco
AU - Emmi, Giacomo
AU - Torre, Francesco La
AU - Olivieri, Alma Nunzia
AU - Maier, Armin
AU - Colafrancesco, Serena
AU - Ruscitti, Piero
AU - Vitale, Antonio
AU - Lopalco, Giuseppe
AU - Gaggiano, Carla
AU - Rigante, Donato
AU - Sota, Jurgen
AU - Maier, Armin
AU - Manna, Raffaele
AU - Cimaz, Rolando
AU - Torre, Francesco La
AU - Pardeo, Manuela
AU - Viapiana, Ombretta
AU - Insalaco, Antonella
AU - Frassi, Micol
AU - Cammelli, Daniele
AU - Cattalini, Marco
AU - Sfriso, Paolo
AU - Fabiani, Claudia
AU - Priori, Roberta
AU - Manna, Raffaele
AU - Cimaz, Rolando
AU - De Benedetti, Fabrizio
AU - Giacomelli, Roberto
AU - Grosso, Salvatore
AU - Mosca, Marta
AU - De Vita, Salvatore
AU - Salvarani, Carlo
AU - Cantarini, Luca
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background and Objective: Only a few studies have reported long-term efficacy of interleukin (IL)-1 inhibition in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and adult-onset Still disease (AOSD). Herein we report on the effectiveness of anakinra (ANA), expressed in terms of drug retention rate (DRR), and evaluate the predictive factors of drug survival in a cohort of patients with sJIA and AOSD.Patients and Methods: This is a multicenter study reviewing retrospectively the medical records from 61 patients with sJIA and 76 with AOSD, all treated with ANA in 25 Italian tertiary referral centers.Results: The cumulative retention rate of ANA at 12-, 24-, 48-, and 60-month of follow-up was 74.3%, 62.9%, 49.4%, and 49.4%, respectively, without any significant differences between sJIA and AOSD patients (p = 0.164), and between patients treated in monotherapy compared with the subgroup coadministered with conventional diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) (p = 0.473). On the other hand, a significant difference in DRR was found between biologic-naïve patients and those previously treated with biotechnologic drugs (p = 0.009), which persisted even after adjustment for pathology (p = 0.013). In the regression analysis, patients experiencing adverse events (AEs) {hazards ratio (HR) = 3.029 [confidence interval (CI) 1.750–5.242], p < 0.0001} and those previously treated with other biologic agents [HR = 1.818 (CI 1.007–3.282), p = 0.047] were associated with a higher HR of ANA discontinuation. The median treatment delay was significantly higher among patients discontinuing ANA (p < 0.0001). Significant corticosteroid-sparing (p = 0.033) and cDMARD-sparing effects (p < 0.0001) were also recorded. Less than one-third of our cohort developed AEs, and 85% were deemed mild in nature, with 70% of them involving the skin.Conclusions: Our findings display an overall excellent DRR of ANA on the long run for both sJIA and AOSD, that may be further optimized by closely monitoring patient’s safety issues and employing this IL-1 inhibitor as a first-line biologic as early as possible. Moreover, ANA allowed a significant drug-sparing effect and showed an overall good safety profile.
AB - Background and Objective: Only a few studies have reported long-term efficacy of interleukin (IL)-1 inhibition in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and adult-onset Still disease (AOSD). Herein we report on the effectiveness of anakinra (ANA), expressed in terms of drug retention rate (DRR), and evaluate the predictive factors of drug survival in a cohort of patients with sJIA and AOSD.Patients and Methods: This is a multicenter study reviewing retrospectively the medical records from 61 patients with sJIA and 76 with AOSD, all treated with ANA in 25 Italian tertiary referral centers.Results: The cumulative retention rate of ANA at 12-, 24-, 48-, and 60-month of follow-up was 74.3%, 62.9%, 49.4%, and 49.4%, respectively, without any significant differences between sJIA and AOSD patients (p = 0.164), and between patients treated in monotherapy compared with the subgroup coadministered with conventional diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) (p = 0.473). On the other hand, a significant difference in DRR was found between biologic-naïve patients and those previously treated with biotechnologic drugs (p = 0.009), which persisted even after adjustment for pathology (p = 0.013). In the regression analysis, patients experiencing adverse events (AEs) {hazards ratio (HR) = 3.029 [confidence interval (CI) 1.750–5.242], p < 0.0001} and those previously treated with other biologic agents [HR = 1.818 (CI 1.007–3.282), p = 0.047] were associated with a higher HR of ANA discontinuation. The median treatment delay was significantly higher among patients discontinuing ANA (p < 0.0001). Significant corticosteroid-sparing (p = 0.033) and cDMARD-sparing effects (p < 0.0001) were also recorded. Less than one-third of our cohort developed AEs, and 85% were deemed mild in nature, with 70% of them involving the skin.Conclusions: Our findings display an overall excellent DRR of ANA on the long run for both sJIA and AOSD, that may be further optimized by closely monitoring patient’s safety issues and employing this IL-1 inhibitor as a first-line biologic as early as possible. Moreover, ANA allowed a significant drug-sparing effect and showed an overall good safety profile.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/368852
M3 - Article
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Pharmacology
JF - Frontiers in Pharmacology
SN - 1663-9812
ER -