Several different approaches to Situational Method Engineering exist. They differ in terms of the primary element of the paradigm: the method fragment definition. Here, we introduce four method fragment definitions from the literature and compare their metamodels according to structural and functional criteria. The structural comparison showed a general alignment of some concepts that are sometimes referred with different names while the study of the compositional aspects results in evidence of substantial differences.
| Lingua originale | English |
|---|
| Pagine | 57-70 |
|---|
| Numero di pagine | 14 |
|---|
| Stato di pubblicazione | Published - 2006 |
|---|
Cita questo
-
APA
-
Standard
-
Harvard
-
Vancouver
-
Author
-
BIBTEX
-
RIS
Seidita, V, Gaglio, S, Gaglio, S, Henderson-Sellers, B & Cossentino, M 2006, '
A metamodelling-based approach for method fragment comparison', pagg. 57-70.
@conference{b83d6a33e56b485eaecd9dff6afcd1da,
title = "A metamodelling-based approach for method fragment comparison",
abstract = "Several different approaches to Situational Method Engineering exist. They differ in terms of the primary element of the paradigm: the method fragment definition. Here, we introduce four method fragment definitions from the literature and compare their metamodels according to structural and functional criteria. The structural comparison showed a general alignment of some concepts that are sometimes referred with different names while the study of the compositional aspects results in evidence of substantial differences.",
author = "Valeria Seidita and Salvatore Gaglio and Salvatore Gaglio and Brian Henderson-Sellers and Massimo Cossentino",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
pages = "57--70",
}
TY - CONF
T1 - A metamodelling-based approach for method fragment comparison
AU - Seidita, Valeria
AU - Gaglio, Salvatore
AU - Gaglio, Salvatore
AU - Henderson-Sellers, Brian
AU - Cossentino, Massimo
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Several different approaches to Situational Method Engineering exist. They differ in terms of the primary element of the paradigm: the method fragment definition. Here, we introduce four method fragment definitions from the literature and compare their metamodels according to structural and functional criteria. The structural comparison showed a general alignment of some concepts that are sometimes referred with different names while the study of the compositional aspects results in evidence of substantial differences.
AB - Several different approaches to Situational Method Engineering exist. They differ in terms of the primary element of the paradigm: the method fragment definition. Here, we introduce four method fragment definitions from the literature and compare their metamodels according to structural and functional criteria. The structural comparison showed a general alignment of some concepts that are sometimes referred with different names while the study of the compositional aspects results in evidence of substantial differences.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/7142
M3 - Other
SP - 57
EP - 70
ER -