Abstract
Several different approaches to Situational Method Engineering exist. They differ in terms of the primary element of the paradigm: the method fragment definition. Here, we introduce four method fragment definitions from the literature and compare their metamodels according to structural and functional criteria. The structural comparison showed a general alignment of some concepts that are sometimes referred with different names while the study of the compositional aspects results in evidence of substantial differences.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
Pagine | 57-70 |
Numero di pagine | 14 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Published - 2006 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- ???subjectarea.asjc.1700.1700???