3D structural modeling and restoration in fold-and-thrust belts: examples from the Kumeta and Busambra Mts., NW Sicily (Italy)

Risultato della ricerca: Other

Abstract

The Sicilian Fold and Thrust belt (SFTB) is a structurally complex area where along-strike variations of structuralstyles, shortening amounts, exhumation rates and amounts of syn-tectonic sedimentation frequently occur.Moreover strong differential clockwise rotations around vertical axes affected the different tectonic units duringtheir emplacement. This complexity, coupled with debatable or incomplete subsurface dataset (e.g., available 2Donshore seismic lines) allowed previous authors to propose different interpretations for the tectonic evolutionof the SFTB since Cenozoic time. The study area, located in the Western sector of the SFTB comprises theKumeta and Busambra ridges (derived from the deformation of Mesozoic and Cenozoic shallow water and pelagiccarbonate deposits, named Trapanese unit), represents a paradigm of such a structural complexity. The two mainstructural interpretations available for this area consider the Kumeta and Busambra ridges either as: I) flowerstructures due to strike-slip tectonics or II) thrust sheets deeply buried by the overthrusting of Mesozoic-Cenozoicdeep-water carbonate thin-skinned thrust sheets (named Imerese and Sicanian units), subsequently exhumed bymore deeply seated thrusts or transpressive faults.The 3D structural model was reconstructed based on both seismic interpretation and field data. The horizonsinterpreted are: the top of Cretaceous carbonates and top of Miocene marl deposits of the Trapanese unit, whichrepresent the “autochthonous” unit, and the top of Mesozoic-Cenozoic deep-water carbonates (Sicano, Imereseunits) and Oligocene-Miocene foredeep deposits (named Numidian Flysch unit) which represent the allochthonousunit. A detailed structural model was reconstructed only for the autochthonous unit.Along strike variation of structural style was recognized. The main structures reconstructed are: WNW-ESEthrusts in the western sector of the study area; WNW-ESE backthrusts in the eastern sector; NNE-SSW tearfaults in the northern sector; WNW-ESE to E-W high angle reverse to transpressive faults along the Kumeta andBusambra ridges. The transpressive movement along high angle faults probably reactivates pre-existing normalfaults of the original passive margin.Paleo-thermal data (vitrinite reflectance, Tmax, illite content in mixed layers illite-smectite) and thermal modellingindicate levels of thermal maturity higher in the Imerese unit than the Trapanese unit. Low burial amounts (0.8 -1.2 km) occurred on top of the outcropping Trapanese unit. Conversely, the structural low between the Kumetaand Busambra structural highs hosted at least 2 km of sedimentary rocks whose origin could be either tectonic,gravitational or sedimentary.On the basis of geometric and thermal reconstructions and differential rotations of blocks, we suggest the followingkinematic evolution for the study area: I) internal thrusting of the Imerese unit (located in a more internal position)during Serravallian times; II) overthrusting of Imerese unit/Numidian flysch above the Trapanese unit duringTortonian times; III) deformation of the Trapanese unit (since the end of Tortonian) with complex deformation,strongly influenced by inherited paleogeography.
Lingua originaleEnglish
Numero di pagine1
Stato di pubblicazionePublished - 2018

Cita questo

@conference{dee6af74c0e94c77b8f6652a0aecbad6,
title = "3D structural modeling and restoration in fold-and-thrust belts: examples from the Kumeta and Busambra Mts., NW Sicily (Italy)",
abstract = "The Sicilian Fold and Thrust belt (SFTB) is a structurally complex area where along-strike variations of structuralstyles, shortening amounts, exhumation rates and amounts of syn-tectonic sedimentation frequently occur.Moreover strong differential clockwise rotations around vertical axes affected the different tectonic units duringtheir emplacement. This complexity, coupled with debatable or incomplete subsurface dataset (e.g., available 2Donshore seismic lines) allowed previous authors to propose different interpretations for the tectonic evolutionof the SFTB since Cenozoic time. The study area, located in the Western sector of the SFTB comprises theKumeta and Busambra ridges (derived from the deformation of Mesozoic and Cenozoic shallow water and pelagiccarbonate deposits, named Trapanese unit), represents a paradigm of such a structural complexity. The two mainstructural interpretations available for this area consider the Kumeta and Busambra ridges either as: I) flowerstructures due to strike-slip tectonics or II) thrust sheets deeply buried by the overthrusting of Mesozoic-Cenozoicdeep-water carbonate thin-skinned thrust sheets (named Imerese and Sicanian units), subsequently exhumed bymore deeply seated thrusts or transpressive faults.The 3D structural model was reconstructed based on both seismic interpretation and field data. The horizonsinterpreted are: the top of Cretaceous carbonates and top of Miocene marl deposits of the Trapanese unit, whichrepresent the “autochthonous” unit, and the top of Mesozoic-Cenozoic deep-water carbonates (Sicano, Imereseunits) and Oligocene-Miocene foredeep deposits (named Numidian Flysch unit) which represent the allochthonousunit. A detailed structural model was reconstructed only for the autochthonous unit.Along strike variation of structural style was recognized. The main structures reconstructed are: WNW-ESEthrusts in the western sector of the study area; WNW-ESE backthrusts in the eastern sector; NNE-SSW tearfaults in the northern sector; WNW-ESE to E-W high angle reverse to transpressive faults along the Kumeta andBusambra ridges. The transpressive movement along high angle faults probably reactivates pre-existing normalfaults of the original passive margin.Paleo-thermal data (vitrinite reflectance, Tmax, illite content in mixed layers illite-smectite) and thermal modellingindicate levels of thermal maturity higher in the Imerese unit than the Trapanese unit. Low burial amounts (0.8 -1.2 km) occurred on top of the outcropping Trapanese unit. Conversely, the structural low between the Kumetaand Busambra structural highs hosted at least 2 km of sedimentary rocks whose origin could be either tectonic,gravitational or sedimentary.On the basis of geometric and thermal reconstructions and differential rotations of blocks, we suggest the followingkinematic evolution for the study area: I) internal thrusting of the Imerese unit (located in a more internal position)during Serravallian times; II) overthrusting of Imerese unit/Numidian flysch above the Trapanese unit duringTortonian times; III) deformation of the Trapanese unit (since the end of Tortonian) with complex deformation,strongly influenced by inherited paleogeography.",
keywords = "3D model, Sicilian FTB, along strike variation of structures, thermal modelling",
author = "{Gasparo Morticelli}, Maurizio and Attilio Sulli",
year = "2018",
language = "English",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - 3D structural modeling and restoration in fold-and-thrust belts: examples from the Kumeta and Busambra Mts., NW Sicily (Italy)

AU - Gasparo Morticelli, Maurizio

AU - Sulli, Attilio

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The Sicilian Fold and Thrust belt (SFTB) is a structurally complex area where along-strike variations of structuralstyles, shortening amounts, exhumation rates and amounts of syn-tectonic sedimentation frequently occur.Moreover strong differential clockwise rotations around vertical axes affected the different tectonic units duringtheir emplacement. This complexity, coupled with debatable or incomplete subsurface dataset (e.g., available 2Donshore seismic lines) allowed previous authors to propose different interpretations for the tectonic evolutionof the SFTB since Cenozoic time. The study area, located in the Western sector of the SFTB comprises theKumeta and Busambra ridges (derived from the deformation of Mesozoic and Cenozoic shallow water and pelagiccarbonate deposits, named Trapanese unit), represents a paradigm of such a structural complexity. The two mainstructural interpretations available for this area consider the Kumeta and Busambra ridges either as: I) flowerstructures due to strike-slip tectonics or II) thrust sheets deeply buried by the overthrusting of Mesozoic-Cenozoicdeep-water carbonate thin-skinned thrust sheets (named Imerese and Sicanian units), subsequently exhumed bymore deeply seated thrusts or transpressive faults.The 3D structural model was reconstructed based on both seismic interpretation and field data. The horizonsinterpreted are: the top of Cretaceous carbonates and top of Miocene marl deposits of the Trapanese unit, whichrepresent the “autochthonous” unit, and the top of Mesozoic-Cenozoic deep-water carbonates (Sicano, Imereseunits) and Oligocene-Miocene foredeep deposits (named Numidian Flysch unit) which represent the allochthonousunit. A detailed structural model was reconstructed only for the autochthonous unit.Along strike variation of structural style was recognized. The main structures reconstructed are: WNW-ESEthrusts in the western sector of the study area; WNW-ESE backthrusts in the eastern sector; NNE-SSW tearfaults in the northern sector; WNW-ESE to E-W high angle reverse to transpressive faults along the Kumeta andBusambra ridges. The transpressive movement along high angle faults probably reactivates pre-existing normalfaults of the original passive margin.Paleo-thermal data (vitrinite reflectance, Tmax, illite content in mixed layers illite-smectite) and thermal modellingindicate levels of thermal maturity higher in the Imerese unit than the Trapanese unit. Low burial amounts (0.8 -1.2 km) occurred on top of the outcropping Trapanese unit. Conversely, the structural low between the Kumetaand Busambra structural highs hosted at least 2 km of sedimentary rocks whose origin could be either tectonic,gravitational or sedimentary.On the basis of geometric and thermal reconstructions and differential rotations of blocks, we suggest the followingkinematic evolution for the study area: I) internal thrusting of the Imerese unit (located in a more internal position)during Serravallian times; II) overthrusting of Imerese unit/Numidian flysch above the Trapanese unit duringTortonian times; III) deformation of the Trapanese unit (since the end of Tortonian) with complex deformation,strongly influenced by inherited paleogeography.

AB - The Sicilian Fold and Thrust belt (SFTB) is a structurally complex area where along-strike variations of structuralstyles, shortening amounts, exhumation rates and amounts of syn-tectonic sedimentation frequently occur.Moreover strong differential clockwise rotations around vertical axes affected the different tectonic units duringtheir emplacement. This complexity, coupled with debatable or incomplete subsurface dataset (e.g., available 2Donshore seismic lines) allowed previous authors to propose different interpretations for the tectonic evolutionof the SFTB since Cenozoic time. The study area, located in the Western sector of the SFTB comprises theKumeta and Busambra ridges (derived from the deformation of Mesozoic and Cenozoic shallow water and pelagiccarbonate deposits, named Trapanese unit), represents a paradigm of such a structural complexity. The two mainstructural interpretations available for this area consider the Kumeta and Busambra ridges either as: I) flowerstructures due to strike-slip tectonics or II) thrust sheets deeply buried by the overthrusting of Mesozoic-Cenozoicdeep-water carbonate thin-skinned thrust sheets (named Imerese and Sicanian units), subsequently exhumed bymore deeply seated thrusts or transpressive faults.The 3D structural model was reconstructed based on both seismic interpretation and field data. The horizonsinterpreted are: the top of Cretaceous carbonates and top of Miocene marl deposits of the Trapanese unit, whichrepresent the “autochthonous” unit, and the top of Mesozoic-Cenozoic deep-water carbonates (Sicano, Imereseunits) and Oligocene-Miocene foredeep deposits (named Numidian Flysch unit) which represent the allochthonousunit. A detailed structural model was reconstructed only for the autochthonous unit.Along strike variation of structural style was recognized. The main structures reconstructed are: WNW-ESEthrusts in the western sector of the study area; WNW-ESE backthrusts in the eastern sector; NNE-SSW tearfaults in the northern sector; WNW-ESE to E-W high angle reverse to transpressive faults along the Kumeta andBusambra ridges. The transpressive movement along high angle faults probably reactivates pre-existing normalfaults of the original passive margin.Paleo-thermal data (vitrinite reflectance, Tmax, illite content in mixed layers illite-smectite) and thermal modellingindicate levels of thermal maturity higher in the Imerese unit than the Trapanese unit. Low burial amounts (0.8 -1.2 km) occurred on top of the outcropping Trapanese unit. Conversely, the structural low between the Kumetaand Busambra structural highs hosted at least 2 km of sedimentary rocks whose origin could be either tectonic,gravitational or sedimentary.On the basis of geometric and thermal reconstructions and differential rotations of blocks, we suggest the followingkinematic evolution for the study area: I) internal thrusting of the Imerese unit (located in a more internal position)during Serravallian times; II) overthrusting of Imerese unit/Numidian flysch above the Trapanese unit duringTortonian times; III) deformation of the Trapanese unit (since the end of Tortonian) with complex deformation,strongly influenced by inherited paleogeography.

KW - 3D model

KW - Sicilian FTB

KW - along strike variation of structures

KW - thermal modelling

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10447/359208

M3 - Other

ER -