[automatically translated] The author in the commentary of the judgment Cass. sez.IV, September 23, 2008, n.41021, concerning a case of failure to injuries obtained custody of a dog, not dwell on guilt and in particular the predictability of judgment. It shows that, in many areas, making this judgment, which also needs to be specified in relation to its application requirements, should continue to be essential, in what is necessary to reconstruct the pre-trial rule to apply in this case.
|Number of pages||8|
|Publication status||Published - 2010|