[automatically translated] The author analyzes the crime under Article. 95, presidential decree No. 115 of 2002, with particular reference to cases where the non-declaration by the applicant for legal aid costs, ownership of real rights on real estate and / or registered movable, would not have resulted in exceeding the maximum income threshold for entitlement to benefit. In such cases, the omission is in fact harmless, having to be identified property protected by art. 95, you court costs, both in the public trust, both in the state property, which is not put in jeopardy if the judge would in any case granted the application.
|Pages (from-to)||1383 ss.-|
|Number of pages||12|
|Journal||DIRITTO PENALE E PROCESSO|
|Publication status||Published - 2009|