[automatically translated] Moving from a comparison with the subsequent and similar dialectic of contraction made by Giordano Bruno, the essays focuses the theoretical framework of the De docta ignorantia (1440) of Nicholas of Cusa, aiming to outline in this way the fundamental theoretical core processing Cusanian, gravitating around the unity of the principle themes of his trinitarian structure, and its deployment outside of itself in the variety of the event. The paper proposes the thesis of continuity and consistency route cusaniano as remodeling continues the 1440 masterpiece, competing with differing view of Hans Blumenberg, that in keeping with a widespread historiographical orientation asserted the route speculative discontinuity cusaniano. To this end, the essay shows how the Cusanian theory of contraction, as well as for its inherently purposive orientation, it connotes primarily for its locating character, founded on the principle dimensionalizzare own power, no crack, their absolute unity and infinity. This investigation has shown how the processing is Cusanian dispoga as an irreplaceable link between the medieval Platonism and soul personalistic of modernity: from Eriugena to Cusano, of up to Leibniz, the absolute principle is semantised in its distributive property, whereby the 'esplicarsi of the One in all is to characterize the figures as a party in the whole, rather than as parts of the whole: it is thus safeguarded, in Cusanian theory of contraction, is the originality of the connection is the ontological consistency of essential procedural requirements. In fact, each unique expression of the One-All, therefore, contains within himself, in the inner space of his infrarelazionalità, all other manifestations of the principle, but in fact limited to its unique, unrepeatable, expressiveness, his unique perspective on the One -All that stands together as one of the one-All gaze. So, if God in the Intelligence (Nous), as the essence of essences, it is guarded every singular essence, coinciding with God himself, in the dialectic of contractive explicatio and complicatio God is still in place everything, but only narrowly, coincides giacchél'Uno , explicated in the single entity, being more precisely of this individual entity. Negative infinity that is contracted in the figure is then revealed as a finiente infinite, that leaves its absoluteness the parties which expressed in its free contraction. Finally, the updating of Cusanian dialectic is found in the intention to move towards dialogue between opposites, and not give up believing unthinkable coexistence of incompossible, greeted in their singularity, thus conceiving the relativity of historical processes as the other side their invisible and irrelativa plot teleological.
|Number of pages||30|
|Publication status||Published - 2008|